<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Crush and Pressure: Both Are Necessary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:40:29 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/09/123207.php#comment-36051</link>
<description>Agreed JR, I&#039;d say there is little question that nuclear weapons are at least SOME kind of deterrent against SOME kinds of actions, including answering the question &quot;why did we invade Iraq when there are other regimes as bad or worse, like North Korea. Possession of nukes by each country also helps explain a lot of the Pakistan-India dynamic as well.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36051@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:40:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/09/123207.php#comment-36043</link>
<description>While we can&#039;t say for sure why the Soviet Union never invaded Western Europe or the U.S. didn&#039;t rush to the defense of Hungary or Czechoslovakia when they most needed it, it could possibly have had something to do with those nuclear arsenals.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36043@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:13:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/09/123207.php#comment-36037</link>
<description>to be honest, i don&#039;t trust any country that has nuclear weapons.  They simply don&#039;t work as a &quot;deterrant&quot; and if they&#039;re not being used as a deterrant, that means the country thinks it will use them someday.
Then again, maybe i&#039;m just a little cynical</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36037@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:07:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/09/123207.php#comment-36004</link>
<description>The good guys need more and bigger toys: who would you rather trust with nuclear weapons, the U.S. or North Korea, Iran, Libya, or Pakistan?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36004@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:39:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/09/123207.php#comment-36001</link>
<description>the one irony is, that the US appears to be increasing its own nuclear stockpile.  Then again, i suppose if they ARE the police of the world, they HAVE to have weapons other countries don&#039;t.  otheriwse, they have alot less power over those other countries.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36001@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:37:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>