<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Dr. Dean the Jelly Bean</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:40:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by dean</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-91892</link>
<description>i am dr dean the jelly bean him self i am fat and very lardge</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91892@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:40:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dean</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-91891</link>
<description>iam dr dean the jelly bean him self</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91891@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35760</link>
<description>
 And you would think supporters of freem markets would realize health care would be more efficient if the insurance companies weren&#039;t part of it.

 Yes, people at insurance companies would lose jobs, but more jobs would be created when people/companies spend the money they save on health care.

 If you talk to doctors, nurses and other health care providers many will say there is a ton of waste (and bad decisions) because of insurance companies.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35760@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2004 05:05:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35750</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;...an agenda which would threaten profits and therefore jobs&lt;/i&gt;

yea...as opposed to outsourcing tech jobs...which boosts corporate profits...and threatens jobs.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35750@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:13:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35735</link>
<description>As an apparant Canadian, I don&#039;t expect you to understand free market economics.  

For chrissakes, people complain when there are not enough jobs, but you promote an agenda which would threaten profits and therefore jobs.

Socialist scumbags
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35735@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:17:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35719</link>
<description>Oh, insurance companies had their profits threatened! The in-corporate-inanity! Think of the stock-price! Won&#039;t anybody think of the off-shore tax-shelters!

Really this tsuris about Howard Dean is just more bullshit from the republican mafia.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35719@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:09:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35716</link>
<description>
 And here I thought it was Ronald Reagan who was into jelly beans.

 The problem was Dean compromised and didn&#039;t go with single payer.  The idea is to not have to worry about insurance company profit margins.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35716@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:53:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35689</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;And Bush was nailed on the &quot;lie&quot;. I hear very little in the mainstream press about this story.&lt;/I&gt;

There you have a point, assuming there&#039;s something to this.  I imagine the story will come out eventually.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35689@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:53:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35682</link>
<description>First off, there is no proof that it was ommitted, or even knew about. If the facts change after you say something, you can&#039;t be responsible for it if it was true at the time.

Also, this is a guy who is using his &quot;record&quot; as governor to get elected.

And Bush was nailed on the &quot;lie&quot;.  I hear very little in the mainstream press about this story.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35682@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:40:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35681</link>
<description>when a liberal leaves something out or changes something in a slight way, even if the change was a mistake...it is pointed out as a &quot;lie&quot;.

if a conservative does this and it is pointed out....well, that&#039;s just &quot;america hating&quot;...how dare you point that stuff out!

;-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35681@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:38:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35680</link>
<description>Stay on topic, by switching topics you prove you have no intellectual rebuttal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35680@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:36:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35678</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;The dirty lie is that it wasn&#039;t really a problem when he took over.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, so omitting a fact is a lie?  &#039;Cause I seem to recall there has been some recent debate over exactly what constitutes a &quot;lie&quot;.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35678@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:34:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35673</link>
<description>Although my favorite will be Andrew (&quot;I took the payoff&quot;) Card&#039;s trail for greasing the wheels of the new state capitalism. Oh, dawn it will be to be alive!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35673@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:30:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35666</link>
<description>I have just been informed he is a butt dentist</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35666@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:18:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35664</link>
<description>Two things: the actual quote is &quot;Lily Jean is a jelly bean&quot; (my daughter), and is it true that Dean is a proctologist?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35664@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:14:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/07/145623.php#comment-35661</link>
<description>Is this whole post really supposed to be a link?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35661@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:10:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>