<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Anna Karenina By Leo Tolstoy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:14:39 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/03/160105.php#comment-35873</link>
<description>Actually, Dr. Zhivago is better in film than in the book.  The original version of Dr. Zhivago, that is.  The one with the incredible Julie Christie.  I&#039;d recommend seeing the film instead of reading the book.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35873@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:14:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ParticleMan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/03/160105.php#comment-35829</link>
<description>True, those books are long and taxing.  I don&#039;t blame you for needing a break.  I usually offset a Russian novel with some Orson Scott Card scifi.  

Angele&#039;s Ashes is awesome.  I have yet to read &#039;Tis, the sequel.

And if you though the plot of Karenina was whack, Karamazov will throw you a curve ball.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35829@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:19:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Murphy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/03/160105.php#comment-35615</link>
<description>Particleman, I like Dostoevsky too...I read (and reviewed here) Crime and Punishment last year. And I loved War and Peace, though I read that several years ago.

I want to try The Brothers Karamazov, and also Dr. Zhivago too...

The only things about these books is that they are so long, they take your whole reading time for a good while. I feel like ripping through a few lesser works for a bit. I&#039;m reading Angela&#039;s Ashes right now, very funny. Maybe I&#039;ll knock of a few shorter ones again befor I dive back into the vastness of Russia.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35615@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:46:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ParticleMan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/03/160105.php#comment-35612</link>
<description>Anna Karenina is indeed amazing.  The characters and story are impressive enough, but it&#039;s the writing that keeps the book hurtling forward.

If this is the first 19th century Russian novel you&#039;ve read, i urge you to delve into Dostoyevsky, especially Brothers Karamazov.  I still can&#039;t decide which i like more- Karamazov or Karenina.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35612@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:31:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/01/03/160105.php#comment-35038</link>
<description>Murphy,  couldn&#039;t agree with you more. Anna Karenina is one of my top ten favorite books of all time.  And I&#039;ve seen every English-language film adaptation, too.  At least twice.

Tolstoy is masterful at capturing the nuances of relationships within families.  He&#039;s quoted as saying something like &quot;Every happy family is happy in the same way, but every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.&quot;  

One thing I like about Tolstoy, and many 19th century novels, is that they keep the reader at a slight distance.  Tolstoy doesn&#039;t bring you deep inside a character&#039;s head the way many modern novels do.  It&#039;s almost a cinematic approach, as if you are a filmgoer watching a movie unfold. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35038@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:36:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>