Private Property for China
Published December 22, 2003
Right now China is basically a non-market for intellectual property - this could help it become a market:
- China is changing its constitution to protect private property rights for the first time since the 1949 communist revolution — a key step in making capitalism its economy's driving force.
A constitutional amendment endorsed by the Communist Party went before legislators on Monday and their approval seemed certain.
Party leaders who control the legislature already say private property is essential to advancing economic reforms that have let millions of Chinese lift themselves out of poverty.
Party leaders also sent the National People's Congress a proposed amendment to enshrine in the constitution the theories of former leader Jiang Zemin, who invited capitalists to join the party, the official Xinhua News Agency said.
Such changes would bring China's legal framework in line with its market-oriented reality. Entrepreneurs who play a critical role in creating jobs and wealth have been lobbying for the constitutional protection.
....The proposed amendment on property says "private property obtained legally shall not be violated," according to Xinhua. It said that would put private property "on an equal footing with public property." [AP]
- Private Property for China
- Published: December 22, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
It certainly appears history will not be able to stop the process, although how long it will take to flesh itself out is up in the air. Imagine how the economy of the world will change - that's one bigass market to export to.
Excellent C-boy, but once is enough.







Interesting.... Imagine what an economic powerhouse that huge country will become when it REALLY incentivizes individuals to start and become success business owners, by allowing them to keep their hard-earned property instead of distributing it within the collective.