<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Hey RIAA, Merry Fricken' Christmas!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:30:01 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33600</link>
<description>It amounts to cyber-stalking which is an invasion of privacy. I can&#039;t believe it took this long for the so-called authorities to figure that out. It would appear that the Canadians are ahead of the game. Merry Fricken&#039; Christmas indeed!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33600@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:30:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33586</link>
<description>I have to look into it more but this sounds like an absolute vindication of those who have been saying the unreviewed subpoena process is unconstitutional. The more of these kinds of rulings we get, the more the recording industry is going to have to work with the P2P biz. Big day.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33586@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:12:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33568</link>
<description>Put me in the camp that would like to see more self/direct artist promotion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33568@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:20:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Taloran</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33567</link>
<description>My hope is that these rulings, and similar ones to follow, will reduce the RIAA to insignificance. Nothing better could happen for the art of music.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33567@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:07:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Doc</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33566</link>
<description>And the Netherlands just ruled Kazaa not responsible for illegal file trading using its software.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33566@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:02:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/19/111151.php#comment-33560</link>
<description>Although I have supported the RIAA&#039;s right to sue downloaders for copyright infringement, I wholeheartedly applaud this decision! The right to sue doesn&#039;t equate to the right to violate privacy. If I&#039;m a downloader, find out who I am without violating my privacy, and then sue me.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33560@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:43:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>