Gander, Meet Goose

Written by bhw
Published December 19, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Goose: So didn't you do something wrong by disregarding the gag order?

Gander: Certainly, if the DEFENSE had disregarded the gag order, that would have been wrong. But I don't see how it applies to me. Besides, I told the judge it was an accident. Whoopsie!

Goose: Haven't you been a lawyer for, like, 30 years?

Gander: What's your point?

Goose: Shouldn't the nation's top law enforcement official and a guy who's been an attorney for so long know that you must obey a gag order?

Gander: Look, we have to do everything in our power to lock up people we know are a danger to our society.

Goose: But I thought you believed in the rule of law. Your bio on the Whitehouse Web site says that you're "committed to confronting injustice by leading a professional Justice Department free from politics, defined by integrity and dedicated to upholding the rule of law."

Gander: I am dedicated to upholding the rule of law, but, HELLO, that applies to everyone else. Law enforcement needs only to make sure other people are obeying the law. We do what's necessary to put people behind bars and then worry about those pesky rules and regulations later.

Goose: So you're saying that you should be able to do whatever you want in a prosecution?

Gander: Just about, or at least as much as we can get away with. If we get caught, we expect to be admonished, but not too harshly.

Goose: You think it's fair that you've been given a judicial admonishment, the lightest sanction a court can impose on an attorney?

Gander: 'Tis but a scratch. I will not be deterred by these silly liberal judges. The GUILTY will be punished!

Goose: Why shouldn't you be charged with criminal contempt? Aren't you in favor of the most serious charges being filed?

Gander: Goose, Goose, Goose. You seem to have mistaken me for an average citizen. THAT, I am most assuredly not.

Goose: Dude, you're the big dog in the justice department. What you say about a trial can influence the jury and unfairly benefit the prosecution, can't it?

Gander: Well, I wouldn't say "unfairly." But yeah, in this case, we nailed the guys.

Goose: Do you think your statements helped the jury convict the defendants?

Gander: DUH. That and the evidence that was withheld from the defense. MAN, I love that Detroit prosecution team! They are working for AMERICA.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Law & Order - The First Year Law & Order - The First Year
DVD,
Law and Order Law and Order
Lindsey Buckingham
Music,
The Law & Order Presidency The Law & Order Presidency
Willard M. Oliver
Book,
Law & Order Law & Order
Video,

Gander, Meet Goose
Published: December 19, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Humor and Satire
Writer: bhw
bhw's BC Writer page
bhw's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by bhw
Culture: Humor and Satire
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/11106)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments