<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>The Return of the King</i> - Get an Editor!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:04:39 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bali</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/17/201105.php#comment-35742</link>
<description>Great and big content literature to find another blog
Good luck guys</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35742@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:04:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by brian</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/17/201105.php#comment-33761</link>
<description>Patience is a virtue.  After spending almost 7 hours on Fellowship and Towers you want a Hollywood wrap-up?  The same criticsm you have of The Return of the King can be applied to the first two installments.  Now, I did have editing/pacing problems with the first twenty minutes or so of The Return of the King, but they rapidly disappeared.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33761@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:51:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by cjones</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/17/201105.php#comment-33574</link>
<description>I agree. I liked it but after awhile I kind of wish Frodo got smoked. The whole things was just too damn long.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33574@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:01:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>