<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on R Kelly: Sleeping with Kids?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:59:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by 50cent on R Kelly: Sleeping with Kids?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/11/110605.php#comment-726278</link>
<description>fuck the game he is a bicth i will kill him</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">726278@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:59:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Pri_Pri on R Kelly: Sleeping with Kids?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/11/110605.php#comment-695097</link>
<description>Well, if R.Kelly didn&#039;t put a gun up to that girl&#039;s head, he didn&#039;t force her. He probably bribe her into doing it. But it is not 100% his fault. Just like it&#039;s not Michael&#039;s fault . These little girl these day&#039;s is very fast and hot. She opened her legs and when she found out he wasnt going to give her what she wanted , she turned it around sayin it was rape. Thats how i see it and im only 15 years and if i am intelligent enough to see that and you not it seems kind of funny. Who should be talked about now?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">695097@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:39:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by rodtavia on R Kelly: Sleeping with Kids?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/11/110605.php#comment-571365</link>
<description>wUZ UP IM REPERSETING IN ROC-TOWN U JNOW WHAT IT BE UM R.KELLY SLEPPING WITH KIDS YEA NO IDK IT DONT MATTA ITS NUN OF ANY OF YOU GUYZ BUISNESS SO GET WITH IT HE SEXY DATZ ALL I KNOW YALL KNOW WETHA TO LET HIM DO IT TO YOU OR NOT U OLD ENOUGH CUZZ IF DAT WUZ ME GODDANGIT YALL SILLY KIDS </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">571365@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:03:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by eXcON on R Kelly: Sleeping with Kids?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/11/110605.php#comment-570586</link>
<description>If R Kelly is guilty then buying any item whereby he revieves royalty fees you are giving financial support to a sex offender. This case saddens me. Maybe if sex offenders produce great albums/films they will be free from punishment? 

Even if the girl lied about her age it is the act of an intelligent and responsible adult to confirm she is of legal age. No excuses. If I close my eyes while driving &amp; kill somebody does that make me not guilty of manslaughter? 

On the other hand...teenagers now are a lot more sexually aware. But an age gap such as this would, in my humble opinion, be too big an issue to let go. I hope that financial resources does not become the deciding factor in this case. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">570586@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Apr 2007 01:28:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>