<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on RIAA to give downloaders the Waco treatment</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:45:19 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32427</link>
<description>they do seem to be willing to attempt to bring the whole industry down in flames (at least the big boys).

i think it&#039;s interesting how they&#039;re absolutely convinced that more downloading equals less cd sales, despite evidence to the contrary.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32427@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:45:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32426</link>
<description>Their &quot;point&quot; being that they are a bunch of thugs willing to invoke the charred bodies of Waco to intimidate kids swapping harmless little music files on the net.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32426@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:42:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32415</link>
<description>I think the RIAA has made their point. It&#039;s well past time to spend the $$ promoting the numerous legal avenues to acquire music online, before some of those services start going out of business.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32415@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:46:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32403</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Oh Mark, you&#039;re SCARING me.&lt;/i&gt;

and while i was typing that stuff in i was thinking about the jim carry/michael bolton sketch from In Living Color...where his head explodes!

dang, that was a great show.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32403@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:37:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32393</link>
<description>Mmm, burnt offerings- [insert Homer Simpson drooling sound]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32393@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:10:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32390</link>
<description>Oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32390@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:11:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32389</link>
<description>Disappointing, Barger.  From your headline, I thought we (I still have LimeWire) were going to become burnt offerings.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32389@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:09:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32383</link>
<description>Oh Mark, you&#039;re SCARING me.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32383@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:52:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32381</link>
<description>whitney&#039;s divorcing bobby brown...maybe she can hook up with michael bolton...and then get celine involved in a three-way....THEN they can all move to canada.

&quot;OH CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANADUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHH!!!!!....&quot;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32381@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:49:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32377</link>
<description>No, I meant &quot;worst.&quot;  This involves a comparison of BAD music.  I don&#039;t care that much for Whitney, but she&#039;s not nearly as yucky and unlistenable as *$%^ Celine Dion.

The Canucks can have an Idol show amongst themselves with no complaint from me, so long as they keep it north of the border.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32377@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:20:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32372</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I&#039;m no big fan of Whitney, but on her worst day she&#039;s no Celine Dion&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m in no position to edit you AL, but didn&#039;t you mean - &quot;on her BEST day she&#039;s no Celine&quot;?

I understand there is also a Canadian Idol show so there is nothing to forgive big guy ;-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32372@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:51:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32357</link>
<description>I&#039;m no big fan of Whitney, but on her worst day she&#039;s no Celine Dion.  Surely you could come up with something far more egregious.

However- as a gesture of goodwill, on behalf of all Americans, I would like to apologize for the American Idol recording of &quot;God Bless the USA&quot; specifically, and for the whole American Idol phenomenon in general.

SO sorry.  Please forgive us.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32357@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:29:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32348</link>
<description>There is much to recommend Canada including our new young friend Jonathan.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32348@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:01:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32333</link>
<description>Only if you will take back Winey, er.. I mean Witney Huston!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32333@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:26:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32214</link>
<description>OK, that&#039;s a point for the Canucks.  Now if you&#039;d just take back your frickin&#039; Celine Dion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32214@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:56:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32208</link>
<description>Ok everybody I&#039;ve got the answer. Make a Canadian your friend. Yes in the Great White North you can download with impunity. Besides a haven for  terrorists, Canukistan is beyond the reach of the RIAA et al.

So, have you hugged a Canadian today?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32208@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 02:16:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32206</link>
<description>When is the recording industry going to learn that crashing dorm rooms and hauling sophomores off to court is not a good strategy? (Although I must admit that it is a crime to download Britney Spears, but that&#039;s a crime of an entirely different kind....) I thought they were wising up by moving to a paid music download model. But apparently they enjoy being mocked as the laughing stocks of the world.  LOL.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32206@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:33:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32166</link>
<description>That&#039;s it, Jonathan- I&#039;m calling the cops!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32166@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:40:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32160</link>
<description>Downloading music as we speak :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32160@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:02:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/12/10/064610.php#comment-32116</link>
<description>You are totally right on this, Al. These self-satisfied fingerfucks just can&#039;t seem to help themselves from ratcheting up the level of outrage they generate, or else they are doing it on purpose. You don&#039;t do overtly confrontational shit like that unless you think you hold all the cards and that just DARES people to show them that they don&#039;t. I don&#039;t hate the labels per se, I don&#039;t hate 90% of the employees and I don&#039;t hate the artists at all (unless I do, but that&#039;s another matter), but I sure-as-the-pope-secretly-thinks-those-troublesome alter-boys-had-it-coming hate the RIAA.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32116@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:22:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>