RIAA to give downloaders the Waco treatment

Written by Al Barger
Published December 10, 2003

Here's a really cute move in the RIAA's attempts to win friends and influence people:

The director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is leaving his post next month to lead the recording industry's efforts to stop music piracy.

Bradley A. Buckles, who served ATF for 30 years and was named director in 1999, will come head of the Anti-Piracy Unit of the Recording Industry Association of America, the trade group announced Tuesday.

"Brad's appointment should signal to everyone that we continue to take piracy, here and throughout the world, very seriously," said Mitch Bainwol, RIAA's chairman and chief executive officer.

So, uh, what are you trying to say with this move? Any of you punks get caught downloading get the David Koresh treatment?

Exactly who do they think they're impressing with this? Does this guy have any other relevant qualifications than pure intimidation? This is the message the RIAA wants to send to some teenage girl downloading the crappy new Britney Spears song? To her parents?

Do they actually think this is a smart move? Do they somehow think that this will not turn customers and voters against them? Are they not afraid that people will mistake these thugs for Alpo?

Leaving his government post and thus the entire weight of the US military behind, I'd like to hereby invite Mr. Buckles to bring his bitch ass down to the farm to stop me from downloading.

Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly and sometimes candidate Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at MoreThings.com, what with the paranoid religious visions and the Pentacostal music and visions of God and anarchy running amok and such. Somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of NEW ALBUM RELEASES.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
RIAA to give downloaders the Waco treatment
Published: December 10, 2003
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Sci/Tech: Internet
All Sci/Tech Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 10, 2003 @ 12:22PM — Eric Olsen

You are totally right on this, Al. These self-satisfied fingerfucks just can't seem to help themselves from ratcheting up the level of outrage they generate, or else they are doing it on purpose. You don't do overtly confrontational shit like that unless you think you hold all the cards and that just DARES people to show them that they don't. I don't hate the labels per se, I don't hate 90% of the employees and I don't hate the artists at all (unless I do, but that's another matter), but I sure-as-the-pope-secretly-thinks-those-troublesome alter-boys-had-it-coming hate the RIAA.

#2 — December 10, 2003 @ 17:02PM — Jonathan

Downloading music as we speak :)

#3 — December 10, 2003 @ 17:40PM — Al Barger [URL]

That's it, Jonathan- I'm calling the cops!

#4 — December 11, 2003 @ 00:33AM — Anita Campbell [URL]

When is the recording industry going to learn that crashing dorm rooms and hauling sophomores off to court is not a good strategy? (Although I must admit that it is a crime to download Britney Spears, but that's a crime of an entirely different kind....) I thought they were wising up by moving to a paid music download model. But apparently they enjoy being mocked as the laughing stocks of the world. LOL.

#5 — December 11, 2003 @ 02:16AM — BB [URL]

Ok everybody I've got the answer. Make a Canadian your friend. Yes in the Great White North you can download with impunity. Besides a haven for terrorists, Canukistan is beyond the reach of the RIAA et al.

So, have you hugged a Canadian today?

#6 — December 11, 2003 @ 03:56AM — Al Barger [URL]

OK, that's a point for the Canucks. Now if you'd just take back your frickin' Celine Dion.

#7 — December 11, 2003 @ 18:26PM — BB [URL]

Only if you will take back Winey, er.. I mean Witney Huston!

#8 — December 11, 2003 @ 20:01PM — Eric Olsen

There is much to recommend Canada including our new young friend Jonathan.

#9 — December 11, 2003 @ 20:29PM — Al Barger [URL]

I'm no big fan of Whitney, but on her worst day she's no Celine Dion. Surely you could come up with something far more egregious.

However- as a gesture of goodwill, on behalf of all Americans, I would like to apologize for the American Idol recording of "God Bless the USA" specifically, and for the whole American Idol phenomenon in general.

SO sorry. Please forgive us.

#10 — December 11, 2003 @ 22:51PM — BB [URL]

"I'm no big fan of Whitney, but on her worst day she's no Celine Dion".

I'm in no position to edit you AL, but didn't you mean - "on her BEST day she's no Celine"?

I understand there is also a Canadian Idol show so there is nothing to forgive big guy ;-)

#11 — December 11, 2003 @ 23:20PM — Al Barger [URL]

No, I meant "worst." This involves a comparison of BAD music. I don't care that much for Whitney, but she's not nearly as yucky and unlistenable as *$%^ Celine Dion.

The Canucks can have an Idol show amongst themselves with no complaint from me, so long as they keep it north of the border.

#12 — December 11, 2003 @ 23:49PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

whitney's divorcing bobby brown...maybe she can hook up with michael bolton...and then get celine involved in a three-way....THEN they can all move to canada.

"OH CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANADUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHH!!!!!...."

#13 — December 11, 2003 @ 23:52PM — Al Barger [URL]

Oh Mark, you're SCARING me.

#14 — December 12, 2003 @ 02:09AM — Mac Diva [URL]

Disappointing, Barger. From your headline, I thought we (I still have LimeWire) were going to become burnt offerings.

#15 — December 12, 2003 @ 02:11AM — BB [URL]

Oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

#16 — December 12, 2003 @ 03:10AM — Al Barger [URL]

Mmm, burnt offerings- [insert Homer Simpson drooling sound]

#17 — December 12, 2003 @ 08:37AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

Oh Mark, you're SCARING me.

and while i was typing that stuff in i was thinking about the jim carry/michael bolton sketch from In Living Color...where his head explodes!

dang, that was a great show.

#18 — December 12, 2003 @ 10:46AM — TDavid [URL]

I think the RIAA has made their point. It's well past time to spend the $$ promoting the numerous legal avenues to acquire music online, before some of those services start going out of business.

#19 — December 12, 2003 @ 12:42PM — Al Barger [URL]

Their "point" being that they are a bunch of thugs willing to invoke the charred bodies of Waco to intimidate kids swapping harmless little music files on the net.

#20 — December 12, 2003 @ 12:45PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

they do seem to be willing to attempt to bring the whole industry down in flames (at least the big boys).

i think it's interesting how they're absolutely convinced that more downloading equals less cd sales, despite evidence to the contrary.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/10816)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments