Blogcritics Comments on The King's Return Draws Near, Jackson Wants to Direct The Hobbit

Comment by IRONDEITY

Sun, 4 Jul 2004 05:19:40 EDT

Jackson has to make "The Hobbit" At this point we've seen all the movies and seen all the awards he has gained for his tireless efforts. Watching all the behind the scenes shots like "Helms Deep" ( and the extream fortitude it took to make it from the actors ), all the created items like armour, clothing, buildings, etc. its become something greater than anything anyone could have imagined. Will Mr. Jackson put his masterful talents at play for The Hobbit ? I say "How can he not ?" Personal review: INCREDIBLE!!! Mr. Jackson you have my personal thanks.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:16:21 EST

I assume that's good.

Comment by jack e. jett

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:05:24 EST

i attended a screening of lotr last night. i am not allowed to review it at this point. i will say that i have never been to such a security tight screening before. it was as if i were going to see the pope or one of the beatles. i will say there was a ton of sobbing going on at the end. jack e. jett the jack e. jett show

Comment by Eric Olsen

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:55:52 EST

Yes, he was in "From Hell."

Comment by Jonathan

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:18:12 EST

Youch! 72! Isn't he also the guy in "From Hell" ?

Comment by Eric Olsen

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:41:04 EST

The actor is Ian Holm, who is now 72. He will not be playing Bilbo, especially considering thta we are talking at least a few years before any of this would get underway. I would think an actor in his forties would be the range they are looking for.

Comment by mark

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:41:36 EST

Yeah they could definatley use the same actor, did you see the make-up job they did on Arnold in T3?

Comment by bside

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:31:44 EST

why couldn't they use the same guy for bilbo? are we forgetting that biblo was pretty darn old when he went on his journy to the lonely mountain in the first place? so give the guy brown hair instead of white/grey and we're good to go!

Comment by Jonathan

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:30:24 EST

I thought you understood the rings life preserving powers after LOTR. It kept Gollum alive and Bilbo.. But yeah they probably couldn't use the same guy, but that's no matter. I'm sure they'd find a suitable actor for the role.

Comment by jadester

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:10:38 EST

it was also suggested, tho this might just have been in the "Tolkein bestiary" (a worhty investment if you can find it for less than the cover price), that the Ring afforded to Bilbo a slightly longer lifetime than the average hobbit - in fact relatives had started to notice he did not appear to age much, if at all, which was a part of his reasoning to leave for Rivendell. The most unfortunate thing if there were to be a film of The Hobbit would be that i seriously doubt they could use that same guy, i forget his name, as Bilbo.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:00:15 EST

I'm sure those are the "complex rights issues" referred to in the story. I bet they'll be able to work it out - vast amounts of money, awards, critical acclaim, and the demands of the public have a way of moving these things along.

Comment by mATT

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:53:06 EST

I hate to be bursting the collective bubble here, but i read me in the news that Tolkien's estate is unwilling to give up the rights to make "The Hobbit." Apparently Chris Tolkien has some problems with the current trilogy and some legal mumbo-jumbo is keeping Jackson within a safe distance of "The Hobbit"

Comment by Jonathan

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:11:43 EST

Even when Frodo is introduced he is a bit boring. What growth I liked most in the story.. Was Sam. I loved that whole undying loyalty between friends thing, and Sam's determination to keep Frodo going. I thought that was great. They are making it a bit to 'wussy' for me in the movie however. Pippin and Merry are growing a bit in the movie, they screw around alot less in the second one :)

Comment by Eric Olsen

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:05:33 EST

Bilbo is certainly livelier, but remember he got to live a lot longer before the weight of the world was thrust upon him, and it was never thrust upon him the way it was on poor Frodo, who was so damaged by the journey he had to go away at the end. I hope Merry and Pippen are allowed to grow as much in the film as they did in the book.

Comment by Jonathan

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:00:15 EST

I always liked Bilbo better than Frodo too. He was a bit more interesting, because he was supposed to be a typical hobbit, which is supposed to mean reclusive and scared of excitement but secretly he had a wild streak. Frodo is a bit more.. I don't know.. easier? He is supposed to have all sorts of inner conflict and such, but he's still a pretty boring character.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:44:05 EST

I would love to see him make The Hobbit too, which in someways I like better than the whole trilogy as a story. Of course it is much smaller scale but it was where Tolkien introduced this amazing, magical world and the first taste is hard to shake. In some ways I also like Bilbo even better than Frodo as a central character, more fun. RE the film series, it's easy to forget how great and epic a job Jackson had to do in order to win over the Tolkien fanatics, who for the most part have become the biggest fans of the films. Keep in mind this is often not the case, with the lovers of a given book rejecting the film adaptation. It's remarkable all the way around.

Comment by Jonathan

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:36:20 EST

oh man.. It'd be GREAT if he made the Hobbit. LOTR and the Hobbit were some of the first books I've read. I really liked the first and second LOTR, and I have faith the third one will be great.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:30:53 EST

I want to see the extended "Two Towers" before I see this, but as soon as the family gets into town for Christmas we'll be there.

Comment by Natalie Davis

Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:22:57 EST

Oh, I can not wait to see this. Finally just saw The Two Towers, so I am soooo ready.