Saudis Serious?
Published December 08, 2003
"We are going to shut down the Islamic affairs section in every embassy," the officials said. "That's the objective." [Washington Post] Whether "the objective" is achieved is another matter, but perhaps the Saudis actually realize that words have consequences and that decades of extremist rhetoric.
- The Saudi action is part of that government's increased vigilance toward expressions of religious extremism after the deadly May terrorist attack in Riyadh that shocked the oil-rich nation and its ruling family. The government has dismissed hundreds of imams from Saudi mosques for allegedly using extremist rhetoric, and has moved to delete language denigrating non-Muslims from school texts and curriculum.
The Saudis also have cracked down on violent Islamic extremists operating in the desert kingdom. In addition, U.S. law enforcement agencies are trying to learn whether hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the embassy here each year have aided extremists in the United States.
If the Saudi government follows through on its pledge to shut down the Islamic affairs offices in its embassies here and around the world, "It would be the first visible sign of an effort to tone down decades of extremist Wahhabi propaganda," said Rita Katz, director of the SITE Institute, a counterterrorism think tank. Wahhabism is a puritanical strain of Islam that sometimes views non-Muslims and Western cultures as enemies of Islam.
Whether this reflects a real change of heart or merely a bow to intense political pressure remains to be seen.
- Saudis Serious?
- Published: December 08, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I would agree that the action is what is most important, but the underlyng intent is probably the best indication of future action and whether the steps being taken are to achieve actual change or just provide the illusion of change.






if the end result is the same, in this case, i would argue it doesn't matter a great deal. If they have to be politically pressured into taking such action, but do end up taking such action, whilst it would be a shame they only feel the need to do it due to pressure, it's better than if they ignored such pressure