The 2003 Grammy Nominations

Written by Stephen Silver
Published December 05, 2003

This year's Grammy nominations were announced yesterday and- damn. If even the middle-aged, almost entirely white music academy gives the majority of Grammy nominations to hip-hop and R&B artists, I think we can finally safely declare rock 'n' roll dead, or at the very least in semi-retirement. The four most-nominated artists (Beyonce, Outkast, Missy Elliott, and Jay-Z) are all African-American, while two others with multiple nods (Eminem and Justin Timberlake) are white but produce "black" music- which, from an academy that gave Best Album two years ago to the worst record of Steely Dan's career, can only be called progress.

Which isn't to say the Academy's traditional old-white-guy bias is a thing of the past- it can't be good for the plight of males in popular music that the Best Male Pop Vocal Performance category consists of two guys who are old (Sting, Michael McDonald), two guys who are dead (George Harrison, Warren Zevon), and one guy who was in 'N Sync (Justin Timberlake). Had Johnny Cash been deservedly nominated instead of Sting, we'd have had the first majority-dead category in Grammy history, although Cash is nominated in several categories, as is the comatose Luther Vandross.

I'm going to shock you: my prediction for Best Album is Timberlake's "Justified"- and it's deserved. After years of producing some of the worst pop music of the decade with 'N Sync, Timberlake somehow put together a great record, showing that he'll still be around long after we've forgotten Britney, Christina, and all the rest. So what if "Justified," up against Norah Jones, Bruce Springsteen, and others, likely would not have even been nominated last year.

Record of Year? It's between "Crazy in Love" and "Hey Ya." Either one's fine by me.

Here, the various absurdities:

-With about 100 categories per year, it's next to impossible for anyone to have a pop music career of any length without winning or been nominated for a Grammy at least once. Which is no excuse for the some of the mediocrities up for major awards this year: Train? Matchbox Twenty? Nickelback?

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Justified Justified
Justin Timberlake
Music,
Two Against Nature Two Against Nature
Steely Dan
Music,
Living History Living History
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Book,

The 2003 Grammy Nominations
Published: December 05, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Writer: Stephen Silver
Stephen Silver's BC Writer page
Stephen Silver's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Stephen Silver
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 8, 2003 @ 01:10AM — randy [URL]

Two Against Nature may have been Steely Dan's weakest album to some ("worst" isn't a term I'd ever use), but it was light years better than anything else out the year it won, and that included Eminem. A weak SD album puts most other artists' output these days to shame, anyway. Yes, I liked it a lot, and I love Steely Dan; it's great to have them back, and it's a shame that the Grammys didn't recognize Everything Must Go in 2003.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/10706)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments