The Idiotic Life

Written by Eric Olsen
Published December 03, 2003

I don't want to be accused of making generalizations, but the few minutes I stumbled across last night of The Simple Life - the Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie socialite-out-of-water "reality series" - did nothing to change my impression that these young women are stupid, outrageously self-centered, vapid, vacuous, nihilistic little ninnies. It's the tragedy of Less Than Zero repeated as bad farce. The hosebag and the junkie don't do a whole lot toward dispelling stereotypes of their indolent ilk:

    For Hilton, the genuine "reality" of living the celebrity life hit home just last month when a video surfaced on the Internet of her enjoying a "sex romp" with a former boyfriend.

    The resulting scandal saw the media-friendly socialite scurrying for seclusion.

    Richie, meanwhile, left Altus for rehab having pleaded guilty before filming for the show began to a charge of heroin possession.

    ....Two young, super-rich socialites, famous for being ... young and super-rich, are the stars of the latest US reality show in which they abandon their party lifestyles to slum it for four weeks on a dairy farm.

    ....The simple premise of "The Simple Life" is the plight of the city-slicker confronted by the harsh realities of making a living in rural America.

    A sort of "Beverly Hillbillies" in reverse, the show takes Hilton and Richie, both 22, from their luxurious Los Angeles homes and flies them — in a private jet — to a farm near the town of Altus, Arkansas (pop. 817).

    Once there, they squeal at insects, milk cows while in full make-up and generally flaunt what they clearly consider to be the required level of wealth-induced ignorance.

    "What is Wal-Mart? Is that where they sell, like, wall stuff?" Paris asks at the dinner table of the family that play hick hosts to the two celebrity cuckoos in their midst. [USA Today]

Remarkably, not only do the girls look like useless twits, the farm family come off as twisted and clueless in their own manner. This meeting is about as far from the suburban reality of the large majority of Americans as Iraq - I wonder if the president will visit while the girls are in Arkansas

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Idiotic Life
Published: December 03, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Television
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 3, 2003 @ 16:48PM — cjones

I watched it also and didn't really understand what I was seeing. I couldn't tell if the girls were reading from a script or actually being themselves because in many of the camera angles and scenes captured they would show one girl make a statement and the other respond. You can tell they had to stop rolling to cut the camera to the other side to see the response. It was like watching 'Cribs' meets 'Real World' meets 'Americas funniest home videos'. It was silly and entertaining but those girls are screwed up. I was looking at Paris Hilton's parents sending her off and I was saying to myself maybe I am the crazy one but something has to be wrong with this family to let their daughter come up like this.

#2 — December 3, 2003 @ 17:02PM — Mac Diva [URL]

I know Nicole's mom from my Atlanta days. (She's the cousin of a friend.) I feel embarrassed for Brenda. I know parents often can't help how their kids turn out, but I expected more of a girl reared with all possible opportunites than shaking her arse at discos and shooting H.

#3 — December 3, 2003 @ 17:26PM — Eric Olsen

Very interesting - thanks Diva. And they are totally shameless about their ineffectuality. The thing that absolutely fried me about Hilton was an interview where she said she didn't need college, that she had made better use of the last four years.

As if she couldn't have been a skank-sack party girl while still picking up a few tidbits about being a human being, and life in the semi-real world for four years to at least slightly deflect her horrifying image and improve her life.

Stupid, stupid little smug bitch - oh-oh, there's that word again.

#4 — December 3, 2003 @ 18:12PM — BB [URL]

"these young women are stupid, outrageously self-centered, vapid, vacuous, nihilistic little ninnies."

Among the many thinks that I appreciate about your posts Eric is that you continually educate me with your formidable vocab. Thank goodness Roget's is always close at hand. ;-)

#5 — December 3, 2003 @ 18:35PM — Eric Olsen

thanks BB, glad to be of service!

#6 — December 3, 2003 @ 22:07PM — Chris Arabia [URL]

Eric, I might have missed it, but was there any word on the Smug Pricks X-Mas-A-Palooza?

#7 — December 4, 2003 @ 01:27AM — Jackson Murphy [URL]

I wholeheartedly agree Eric. One thing does strike me though. That even the idle rich will make fools of themselves for even greater fame.

Part of me says we've jumped off the cliff, the other part just wants to curl and watch another hour of Paris being a complete dummy on national tv. I can't make up my mind.

#8 — December 4, 2003 @ 07:51AM — Eric Olsen

Jackson, the idle rich, who are more visible in Europe due to the lingering aristocracy, have always been supremely pointless and idiotic so I don't see any cliffs there. I imagine these two were picked because they are friends and are utterly shameless and without guile or guilt in their insular retardation.

Chris, between my pre-childbirth tension and recent outbursts of smugness, I sense a gala performance and enthusiastic "review" of a Smug Pricks performance coming up real soon.

#9 — December 4, 2003 @ 11:41AM — Bruce Kratofil [URL]

With this TV show as evidence, is it safe to say that pop culture as a whole has
"jumped the shark"?

#10 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:05PM — Eric Olsen

I'd say broadcast TV has anyway. I imagine when the execs are finally convinced that people are sick of this stupid faux-reality shit, we might get something more interesting again, but I wouldn't bet on it either. I would say the real answer is fragmentation that has left the broadcast audience much smaller and even more fickle than before.

#11 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:12PM — Chris Arabia [URL]

Eric, best wishes on the natal front.

I anxiously await the SP's next move.

Broadcast TV will decreasingly exert influence beyond its numbers relative to all the other channels, as Eric intimated.

I can think of several channels that I might watch for an hour or two a week...

#12 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:22PM — Eric Olsen

Thanks Chris, I have tried to contain my percolating bile as the last time resulted in the self-immolation of the target - there are few powers greater than righteous indignation unleashed.

#13 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:33PM — Chris Arabia [URL]

Yes. Yes indeed.

On a related front, the same to the better half.

#14 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:37PM — Eric Olsen

thanks, will pass on

#15 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:51PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

they are . . . utterly shameless and without guile or guilt in their insular retardation.

That's probably the most eloquent summation of this show's appeal I have seen yet.

#16 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:55PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

i saw an interview with nicole where she said she'd never heard of 'generic' food products.

not surprising, i guess.

#17 — December 4, 2003 @ 12:58PM — Eric Olsen

thanks Tom, at least they're "good" at something. Paris had never heard of Wal-Mart - ponder that for a moment.How disconnected from our shared culture would you have to be to have no idea what the hell Wal-Mart is. Fucking Martians have heard of Wal-Mart.

#18 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:31PM — Dawn

I love WAL-MART. LOVE IT, LOVE IT, LOVE IT. Illegal immigrants and all.

#19 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:34PM — Natalie Davis [URL]

I am proud to say I have never shopped at Wal-Mart. IMO, it symbolizes much of what is wrong with your country.

#20 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:37PM — Dawn

If you were as poor as I am, you would not only shop at Wal-mart, but name your first born Wal M. Art.

Besides, those old people at the door, I mean who can resist old people greeting you?

#21 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:39PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

i can understand the money issue.

personally, i can't stand walmart...mostly because it's so friggin' noisy in there, it's like stickin' your head beyond the gates of delirium.

i'm gettin' a little panicky just thinking about it.

#22 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:44PM — JR

I'm not too impressed with Wal-Mart's trade partners.

#23 — December 4, 2003 @ 13:55PM — Eric Olsen

Apart from all kinds of legitimate concerns about Wal-Mart, I like to be able to walk in one door and get pretty much everything I need or want in one place at one time for more or less the lowest possible price. That is hard to beat - hence its weed-like spread.

#24 — December 4, 2003 @ 17:58PM — Mac Diva [URL]

I don't like the warehouse stores because the choices are so damned big. What is a single person, or a small family, supposed to do with 24 or 48 rolls of toilet paper or paper towels anyway? In Portland and Seattle, the population is about half singles. But, the warehouse stores seem not to realize we exist.
And, I might as well admit that I've never actually been in Wal-Mart. Not out of snobbery, but because of lack of need. Maybe I'll go as a field trip.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/10636)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments