<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Ed Schultz As Incoherent As Ever</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:35:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by liz pierce on Ed Schultz As Incoherent As Ever</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/25/121725.php#comment-629476</link>
<description>go big ed! love your show. you don&#039;t yell or call names. mostly i agree with you but i know if we differed on a point you would hear me out and we could have a reasonable discussion. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">629476@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:35:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tinchamplin on Ed Schultz As Incoherent As Ever</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/25/121725.php#comment-580099</link>
<description>Debate? 
Big Ed chalanged Dennis Prager to a debate. Ed backed out. It was all a bluff. 
Liberals cant debate about the truth because it is not on their side. They will lose every time. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">580099@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:36:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>