<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Fan Vigils for MJ Fizzle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:27:54 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29984</link>
<description>Yeah, it&#039;s already being reported online; saw it earlier today. Really mindblowing stuff.

Lovely, McGee. Geez, that&#039;s enough BC today.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29984@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:27:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29974</link>
<description>I&#039;m listening on a local talk radio station ATM that tomorrow papers are going to report that there are explicit letters that Michael wrote forming part of the major part of the prosecution.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29974@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:41:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big McGee</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29972</link>
<description>I hope Michael gets lynched.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29972@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:36:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29959</link>
<description>The idea of &quot;Micheal Is Innocent&quot; vigils was quite a bit much to begin with. Let the courts do their job. Apparently, most people are with the scummy media in assuming guilt or they are withholding judgment, the latter being, IMO, the wiser course of action.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29959@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 18:25:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29940</link>
<description>Yes Anita, I agree. This all seems so deja vu because he has been doing these same things - completely apart from the question of crossing the line into molestation - for years and years and the public has been saying this is very strange, almost certainly inappropriate, and no one close to him seems to have had the will or the nerve to tell him to get it together and grow the hell up. Or else he just won&#039;t listen or just doesnt&#039; give a damn.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29940@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:21:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/23/121944.php#comment-29938</link>
<description>Michael Jackson has become a pitiable figure who is isolated from the society around him.  Unfortunately he does not realize how far his behavior diverges from the general mores of the public he purports to entertain. I&#039;m sure some Jacko fan out there will protest loudly, but I agree that it&#039;s tough to support someone who openly admits to some very unhealthy behavior with children.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29938@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:12:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>