<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on More changes to Star Wars?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 02:30:24 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29895</link>
<description>Naturally, South Park had an outstanding episode [#609 Free Hat] in which the boys went into an Indiana Jones type adventure to rescue the film masters before Lucas could screw with them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29895@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 02:30:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jim</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29873</link>
<description>Some of the changes being made do improve the movies. I have been a Star Wars fan from day one, and have read all the novelizations. Adding the Solo/Jabba scene in the hanger bay on Tatooine was an improvement. Having Boba Fett the was not.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29873@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:06:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29842</link>
<description>Hey, if he wants to do a Director&#039;s Cut, then more power to him, but he should also release/sell the original unedited for the purists.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29842@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:53:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29835</link>
<description>He should fix &quot;Howard the Duck&quot;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29835@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:20:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29813</link>
<description>I wish he would leave them alone too. But they belong to HIM -- he can do what he darn well pleases with them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29813@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:06:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29803</link>
<description>George Lucas must be stopped.  His tinkering is ruining many great movies.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29803@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:50:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Puzak</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29741</link>
<description>I think it was &lt;I&gt;E.T.&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Close Encounters of The Third Kind&lt;/I&gt; that Spielberg was mucking about with. The problem I have with Lucas is not that he&#039;s changing things in the original trilogy, but that he&#039;s not doing a particularly good job of it. There were some nice aspects to the special editions, there were also some parts that just plain didn&#039;t work. The problem is that Lucas is surrounded by people who won&#039;t speak up and say &quot;You know what George, that&#039;s not a good idea&quot;.

There are some movies that really beenfit from tinkering, such as &lt;I&gt;Touch of Evil&lt;/I&gt;. But I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much you can do with the &lt;I&gt;Star Wars&lt;/I&gt; trilogy. Inserting CGI into the original bad just looks terrible and doesn&#039;t add anything to the movie. The puppets and models of the original trilogy just plain look better. 

I&#039;d like to see Lucas move on from &lt;I&gt;Star Wars&lt;/I&gt;. &lt;I&gt;Thx-1138&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;American Graphitti&lt;/I&gt; are both fine movies; I believe he could make movies like that again.  I just wish he&#039;d realize that it&#039;s a lost cause endlessly trying to improve movies taht are already as good as they&#039;re going to get.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29741@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:56:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Wilson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29686</link>
<description>It appears both Lucas and Spielberg, same generation film geeks, seem to have an obsession with tinkering with their films after completion. Didn&#039;t Spielberg also redo &quot;Close Encounters,&quot; &quot;Duel&quot; and &quot;Jaws?&quot; Frankly, no amount of tinkering is going to save &quot;Star Wars Episode 1.&quot; But let&#039;s be frank. Lucas&#039; mission/purpose in life will forever be the &quot;Star Wars&quot; films. They will be his legacy. Can we blame him for obsessively trying to achieve a form of perfection? One can argue his artistic depth, but one cannot argue his love for his creations.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29686@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:09:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kurt Nordstrom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/110255.php#comment-29666</link>
<description>I think Lucas is hitting the bong kind of hard in his later years, but I am pleased to hear the truth finally come out.  Han shot first, dad-gummit!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29666@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:33:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>