<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Financial Troubles for MJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:00:42 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29867</link>
<description>Michael will be disappointed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29867@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:00:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29866</link>
<description>Sorry, Eric. I have dibs on space.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29866@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:26:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29856</link>
<description>I think space is the place, Al</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29856@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:40:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29853</link>
<description>Perhaps there&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morethings.com/log/2003-01-05byberry.htm&quot;&gt;A VIABLE SOLUTION&lt;/a&gt; for Michael Jackson&#039;s various problems.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29853@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:44:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29841</link>
<description>we are in agreement and you are wise</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29841@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:44:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29825</link>
<description>Eric, many people believe Tyson got a raw deal in his rape conviction. I do not agree with those people.

As for MJ, I presume innocence until he is proven guilty in court. That said, of course I don&#039;t support that baby-dangling business (that blew my mind) and I wouldn&#039;t allow my kids to have sleepovers with non-age-appropriate  friends, whether or not they were self-proclaimed deities of pop. But neither of those things necessarily make Jackson a child molester. I&#039;ll wait until all the information is out and the evidence presented. And apparently, there is much still awaiting revelation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29825@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:07:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29820</link>
<description>Michelle, surely you aren&#039;t saying there have been false charges against Mike Tyson?!? he is one of the most deranged thugs in the public eye of the last century.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29820@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:58:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michelle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29799</link>
<description>he is just another case that&#039;s just destroyed by false charges against him - like tupac shakur, whom they even tried to accuse of sodomy to destroy his reputation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29799@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 05:34:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Taloran</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29635</link>
<description>I once respected Tyson&#039;s work in the ring. He was unbelievable at age 21. Now even that&#039;s gone, and not strictly because of age.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29635@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:37:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29631</link>
<description>it&#039;s hard to say in the big picture, but their plunges cover similar altitude</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29631@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:22:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29629</link>
<description>i don&#039;t know. has &lt;i&gt;anybody&lt;/i&gt; ever respected tyson?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29629@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:16:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Taloran</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29628</link>
<description>Who has fallen further, Mike Tyson or Michael Jackson?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29628@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:10:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29587</link>
<description>He is of course a pitiable figure, but when the safety of children are concerned, they must become the priority.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29587@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:15:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/21/085849.php#comment-29585</link>
<description>i do feel sorry for jackson (not that that let&#039;s him off the hook for what he may have done or anything).

seems like he&#039;s the textbook example of somebody who was just crushed by his celebrity. the friggin&#039; ranch, the cosmetic surgery....man, it&#039;s just creepy, and sad.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29585@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:10:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>