<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on CBS Yanks Jacko</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:25:06 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/213251.php#comment-29329</link>
<description>lol

I&#039;m a nut for Pee-wee, um, Paul Reubens. Has he been found guilty of more than loving himself in a movie theater?

Oh, Jeffrey Jones... Loved him in &lt;I&gt;Amadeus&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Ferris Bueller&#039;s Day Off&lt;/i&gt;. Whatever was the resolution in his most unfortunate case? He was charged with having naughty pictures of children on his computer, no?

As for Jacko, I just want to weep. And I have no idea whether he is just weird or if he is dangerous. But this case, so far, does not look good. Gotta keep telling myself -- no one can take &lt;I&gt;Thriller&lt;/i&gt; away from him.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29329@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:25:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/213251.php#comment-29327</link>
<description>Pee-wee, Jacko and Jeffrey Jones, oh my.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29327@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:49:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/213251.php#comment-29311</link>
<description>Drat!  I might have turned on the tube to see &quot;The Reagans,&quot; but I don&#039;t have Show Time.  I&#039;ve always wanted to hear about the astrologer who was running the country during the Reagan years.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29311@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:47:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/213251.php#comment-29305</link>
<description>Yeah. Wusses and cowards and freaks, oh my. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29305@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:56:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by S Novak</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/213251.php#comment-29303</link>
<description>Yah. I agree.  I also read that &quot;The Reagans&quot; is scheduled to air the day after Thanksgiving. Interestingly, the newsies included the information that this also happens to be the second-most traveled day of the year.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29303@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:34:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>