Blogcritics: Comments on Whacko Jacko Redux

Comment by Snovak

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:54:19 EST

Interesting... And I also see where there are now MULTIPLE counts (likely from the same boy). So, if this was over a period of time, why did the kid keep going back? Maybe all that money Jacko is short wasn't actually lost.... Everybody and their mother (no pun intended) out for what they can get. No good can possibly come from any of this and karma is a powerful force to screw with.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:51:14 EST

which doesn't mean there isn't a series of wrongs to right, dating back at least ten years

Comment by jack e. jett

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:46:19 EST

here is the first two paragraphs of the prosecuter on michael jackson case: ------------------ As Thomas W. (Tom) Sneddon, Jr., an NDAA vice president, begins his sixth and, he says, his last four-year term this month as DA of Santa Barbara County, California, he can look back on a successful and colorful career with many distinctions. One of those distinctions he could do without: He's the only DA in the nation to have an angry song written about him by pop megastar Michael Jackson. _____________- notice that in the second paragraph he mentions that michael wrote a song about him. he seems very happy with that fact. me thinks this guy is out more for publicity than to right a wrong. jack e. jett the jack e. jett show

Comment by jack e. jett

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:51:50 EST

this is going to make superstars out of the sherrif, mark geragos, and other talking heads. i wish that i could figure out a way to get some publicity for my show our of it. on a serious note.... i agree 100% with cjones. the parents hold some responsibility for allowing their child to be alone with him, if indeed this is true. with the money spent on this situation already....500 other child molesters could have been arrested..but no one could bring in the press like mikey. jack e. jett the jack e. jett show

Comment by JR

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:01:31 EST

Perhaps the settlement will pay for therapy for the kid with enough left over for a new Cadillac, thus making it a sound financial decision to let their kid be molested by Michael Jackson. (Wow, that sounded too cynical even by my standards.)

Comment by cjones

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:55:24 EST

Why aren't the parents questioned for sending their child to a famous pedophile? Are they looking for a financial windfall by settling out of court?

Comment by Snovak

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:49:33 EST

Got it. Funny that after I checked my URL I tried 3 different OTHER URL's to link the Patriot Act. I tried each one myself and all came up on respective home pages as "document not available." Even looking on the Senate page thru Thomas. Funny, huh?

Comment by Hal Pawluk

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:22:05 EST

Your "shut up" link is broken (no page name). But your post is on the money.

Comment by Eric Olsen

Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:09:11 EST

thanks Sandra and welcome! It is all so depraved and vile, I feel sick