<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Is Michael Jackson being framed again?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:55:44 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by jack e. jett</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/19/030906.php#comment-29299</link>
<description>hey:

i don&#039;t know if michael jackson is guilty or not.   i do know that diane dimond is guilty of being a freaking over the top nutcase on court tv.  i was watching her today and is in full freak attack mode.  she has made a career out of bashing jackson.  you can tell she has $$$ signs in her eyes.  i love her though...but then i love most talking head tv whores.

jack e. jett 
the jack e. jett show</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29299@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:55:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>