Treason by Ann Coulter
Published November 17, 2003
One might forgive Coulter her black and white worldview if she was at least clear and concise about her own argument. Instead she jumps back and forth between decades without considering that things might have changed between Truman and Reagan. She uses liberal and Democrat interchangeably with no real attempt to explain what liberal means or how it might be different from others on the left or how the Democratic party might have changed in the post-war era. She doesn't even seem cognizant of the changes within conservatism during the post war period. She holds up Reagan as the only authentic conservative president since World War II but fails to explain how that affects figures like Eisenhower, Nixon, and Ford. Were they on the devils side with the liberals or were they on the side of the angels with the GOP? Were liberal Republicans better than liberal Democrats?
If her rhetoric is confusing, her history is no better. Because she is stuck at 10,000 feet she fails to consider the policy going on at a much lower level. This is the "Great Man" theory of history taken to the extreme. Coulter's obsession is with the party leaders and the talking heads in the press so she ignores any policy making below the level of President or Senator. She ridicules containment and praises the concept of roll back or "nothing but victory," but fails to mention that there was a great deal of policy going on behind the scenes that was aimed at rollback and victory before Ronald Reagan came along and under Democratic Presidents too. She rightly points out the treasonous activities of many of the liberal elite, especially under FDR, but she never acknowledges that there were honest liberal, and even leftist, anti-communist intellectuals and politicians. She mentions Reagan's secret meeting with the Pope but she fails to mention CIA funding of liberal non-profit groups and newspapers in Europe during the Cold War. Coulter writes as if the Korean War would have been won if Truman hadn't fired Macarthur. She assumes that the U.S. could have won in Vietnam if Democrats hadn't hamstrung the military. These points might be arguable, and many conservatives believe them to be true, but Coulter fails to offer a compelling argument, instead blaming the failure on liberals. Adding to the incongruity and confusion is her insistence on trying to wrap the entire post-war period into one neat argument. The sections on the War on Terror and Iraq, not to mention the chapter on celebrities, seem tacked on and superfluous. Plus, it is maddening trying to follow the arguments as she jumps around in time, castigating liberals in the forties one minute and Al Gore the next.
- Treason by Ann Coulter
- Published: November 17, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: History, Books: News, Books: Nonfiction, Books: Politics and Affairs
- Writer: Kevin Holtsberry
- Kevin Holtsberry's BC Writer page
- Kevin Holtsberry's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Kevin, you need to retype the mistakes in the Blogcritics edit window. Sometimes, particularly when I copy from Blogger or the Chronicle Lite API client, things don't post right.
The aspect that annoys me most (and the critics, too) about that book is Coulter made up so much of it, including the footnotes. One sees people refuse to do any research in the blogosphere quite often, but the standards for a published writer who wants to be taken seriously are much higher. That is why she will remain a laughingstock to anyone except Far Right fellow travelers. Sure there are legitimate criticisms to be made about liberals and liberalism, but her ilk is incapable of making them.
I have had varying rates of success changing the font to ARIAL in MS Word and then copying it and pasting it. I haven't figured out why it works sometimes and not others. Try Arial though. It seems to copy in the quotes and apostrophes most successfully for me.
I created a fix for this distorted character problem that many of us have experienced, so feel free to bookmark and use: fixchar.
Instructions: Before posting to Movable Type simply cut and paste from your word processor into the form and click "Submit" Next, cut and paste the script generated results into the Movable Type form field. This program will cleanse the distorted output by removing/converting the troubled ASCII characters, if any exist.
This will not strip out HTML and also will display a preview of how the content/html will appear. Optionally you can show the ASCII character value (for the geeks in the audience). It automatically converts carriage returns to < BR > tags in the display.
Please let me know if there are any issues with this script. I tested with this entry above and it fixed the distorted characters. The script is free and if you use it then please consider adding a link to my blog from yours or to my script site tdscripts.com ;)
Damn TDavid, that has dogged us from the beginning, thanks! The problem is that Amazon doesn't recognize non-standard characters, which include smart quotes (turn them off in your word processor), some dashes, some apostrophes. Turning off smart quotes will get rid of most of the problem, sounds like TDavid has come up with an answer for the rest.
If you look through this post, you can see where anything with a curve to it generates the dreaded "A"s
Obviously these problems are the work of commie subversives. Brian Flemming, we're looking at you...
Kevin, the more I think about your point in regard to McCarthy, the more it troubles me. I think the issue is whether there was a big enough problem with domestic spies to justify ruining all the lives McCarthy did, not whether there were any spies (Communist or otherwise) working for the government.
The wretched Smart Quotes from Microsoft are clearly an evil plot by libruls.
Even when the nonstandard characters appear, all you have to do is go back in and change them once you are in Movable Type. I shall edit these out right now as they are making my face hurt.
The questions isn't "whether there was a big enough problem with domestic spies to justify ruining all the lives McCarthy did" but why did the government allow spies at the thighest levels of government? The choice between ruining lives and getting rid of spies is a false choice. McCarthy's tactics were wrong in many ways but the issue he was getting at remains: the elite tolerated spies because they could believe that their social equals would be traitors. Historical documents reveal that in fact FDR's administration was a breeding ground for spies and many of those people continued to influence government policy well into the Cold War.
Eric: The dreaded "A"'s appear as the author intended them if you switch your charset to UTC-8. Maybe we need to switch the template's Content-Type.
Kevin: I don't know if I'm just splitting hairs, but while I agree that espionage at the behest of a foreign power is a crime and not tolerable, I oppose the concept of "thought crimes". The constitution explicitly protects opinion, especially political opinion, even if it is vile or "anti-american".
If McCarthy had reached for a Federal Grand Jury instead of a television camera, his accusations of criminal behavior would have been of more merit.
I saw left-wing folk-singer Billy Bragg on tour a few years ago (prior to "Treason") and he was very up-front about his communist/socialist past. He told us that it was important for the left to acknowledge that Communism, which sounded so very promising, led to oppressive totalitarian regimes.
I'm with Bragg. Communism didn't work. It was no worker's paradise. At the same time, think McCarthy and Hoover compromised the ideals of America from within by attacking freedom of thought and expression.
I think that's about right, Michael.
Coulter's a flash in the pan who shoots from the hip. She likes to stir it up for media attention and she won't last.
She's just going for shock value to sell books, but her propaganda won't stand up in ten years, except maybe in the discount bin at Walmart.




I am not sure why Blogcritics has trouble with quotation marks. I think it has something to do with Microsoft Word but I can't seem to fix it. I tried saving the text as text only and clearing any formating but nothing seems to work.