<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on 40 Million Copies</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:20:59 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28289</link>
<description>I&#039;d go with the recent Best of: Only the Beginning. It&#039;s a bargain double-CD and covers the whole career. I probably like the very first one - Chicago Transit Authority - best if I had to pick one studio album.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28289@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:20:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28281</link>
<description>Just my opinion, but if memory serves, the first three are the best of the lot and &lt;i&gt;Chicago II&lt;/i&gt; is the cream. If you must own one Chicago record, that&#039;s the one to get.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28281@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:37:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28279</link>
<description>Having been born too late for Chicago really, would you consider 25 or 6 to 4 one of their better songs?  I just wonder exactly which albums are the best and least cheesy.

I did this same exercise with Genesis when someone told me that Phil Collins hadn&#039;t always been writing their songs and making them bad.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28279@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:27:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28277</link>
<description>In general, Chicago was best when they rocked hardest, and Kath was a great hard rock guitarist. Hey, he should be on the list.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28277@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:24:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28275</link>
<description>Then Peter Cetera&#039;s name became synonymous with Ralph Macchio and the Karate Kid movies.  It makes me miss classics like 25 or 6 to 4.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28275@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:20:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28272</link>
<description>I sat in the studio for about a week of the recording of Chicago 17 - most of it the horn parts of &quot;Hard Habit to Break.&quot; It was both fascinating and excruciatingly dull at the same time. Olivia Newton John came down to the studio to say hello to Peter Cetera, who by then was totally the &quot;rock star&quot; of the band. We also went to Bill Champlin&#039;s house for an interview - pretty cool week. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28272@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:10:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28263</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Alpha&quot; sucked&lt;/i&gt;

I totally agree.  Album-wise, Asia were very much a one hit wonder.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28263@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:49:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28259</link>
<description>I can basically agree with that, although there is some Blur I like a lot.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28259@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:31:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28258</link>
<description>Excepting the greatest hits package, I bought all these AND &quot;Chicago XVII&quot;.

&quot;Alpha&quot; sucked.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28258@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:30:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28257</link>
<description>OK, so which recent big acts will have long come and gone in 20 years time?  My guess is all the &#039;Britpop&#039; bands like Oasis.  They were as ubiquitous in Britain of the late 90s as Journey were to America of the early 80s.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28257@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:19:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28245</link>
<description>Tim, somehow I ended up with most of them too - still not sure how that happened, I imagine I needed them for DJing. My point wasn&#039;t to knock these as bad, just to marvel at their ubiquity in the &quot;heat of the moment,&quot; a moment that has long come and gone.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28245@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:45:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/11/11/192446.php#comment-28244</link>
<description>Hey, I bought all of those albums (except for the April Wine one), and loved the Asia one when it came out.  

I don&#039;t think bands like Journey were ever as loathed by &#039;fashionable music fans&#039; in Britain as they were in the US, because their kind of corporate rock was never big in Britain at the time; our charts were much more dominated by new wave acts.  Only hard rock fans really knew Journey existed, and we bought their albums for the rockers like &#039;Edge of the Blade&#039; rather than the power ballads.

I admit Mike Stone&#039;s very 80s overproduction sounds rather dated now.  But so does Trevor Horn on Yes&#039; 90125.

In 2010, I bet grunge will sound just as dated.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28244@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:41:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>