Merge With Caution
Published November 07, 2003
Speculation has been rife for at least a year, but yesterday Sony and BMG agreed to merge music units. Warner Music Group and EMI are talking. And then there were three?:
- Sony Music and BMG on Thursday said they plan to combine their music units in a move that could trigger further consolidation as the industry grapples with weak retail sales, online file-sharing and fierce competition with other forms of entertainment.
The 50-50 joint venture combines No. 2 Sony, which includes such artists as Beyonce Knowles and Bruce Springsteen, with No. 5 BMG, a unit of German media firm Bertelsmann that is home to Britney Spears and Elvis Presley. It creates a powerhouse that rivals leader Universal Music Group.
The deal vaults the companies ahead of Time Warner Inc.'s Warner Music Group and EMI Group Plc, which are discussing a combination of their own.
"If (Sony and BMG) stood alone, we would have to cut artist rosters and even closing activities in smaller countries," said BMG chief executive Rolf Schmidt-Holtz. "This merger is the best guarantee that we can maintain a broad roster of artists in the current environment."
....A final agreement, which will exclude the companies' publishing and manufacturing operations, is expected within several weeks, after which it will go before competition watchdogs on both sides of the Atlantic.
....by excluding the publishing and manufacturing business, the deal was likely to have an easier path to regulatory approval.
Sony BMG would rival market leader Universal Music's 25.9 percent share of global music sales, with a share of 25.2 percent based on 2002 sales, while a combined EMI-Warner Music would have 23.9 percent. [Reuters]
- Merge With Caution
- Published: November 07, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Music
- Filed Under: Music: News
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
what did you do in the biz Johno?
Many things, in a fairly brief period.
For a while I did label-side tour marketing, which became tour finance and marketing, and finally tour finance, marketing, and sometimes logistics. When I switched companies I moved into label operations-- which is pretty much like managing any corporate operations but with more databases and stuff, and topped it off with IT management, ecommerce operations management, and consumer relations. Also, there was marketing, artist relations, and direct-to-artist recoupable and royalties eligible sales, and also various menial duties. I worked for some smaller labels, so I wore many hats and worked long hours.
What it boils down to is I got my name in the "thank-yous" of some little-known albums, and for a certain swath of years, the UPC codes and catalog numbers on a certain label group's releases came from me.
That, plus price of admission, will get me into any concert on the planet.










As an economist friend of mine reminded me today; mergers rarely create value. They might streamline operations, they might cut some costs, but the advantage can be dubious.
My ever-so-learned take is this: the Big Five became the Big Four, and are about to become the Big Three. The snake is eating its tail. As music becomes even more (!) commodified and deployed as a loss-leader by multinational corporations to cross-promote other products, the current label system will break down. Will a thousand roses bloom? Hell if I know. Will Janis Ian be right, and ten thousand artists reach their audiences by selling out of the trunk of their car and off their websites? Probably. But it will be different.
I'd put money on it, if I had any. This merger signifies desperation on the part of Bertelsmann and Sony.
Of course, what the fuck do I know? I got kicked OUT of the music business.