Future of Broadcasting

Written by Craig Lyndall
Published November 05, 2003

CBS has canceled the Ronald Reagan mini-series on their network and it will now be shown over on Showtime. For those of you who missed it, the synopsis of the story goes like this. CBS buys/approves a script for a Ronald Reagan biography/mini-series. The mini-series gets made and early warning for the film starts ruffling Republican feathers because "Reaganites" everywhere are upset with the film's portrayal of Nancy and Ronnie. CBS head honcho Les Moonves looks to get the thing edited so he can salvage his special, but eventually decides to dump it over on Showtime instead of putting it on CBS. The ultimate motives for him moving the special are the points of controversy. People are understandably questioning what line of thinking went into the ultimate decision to dump it.

There are a few different viewpoints on this that I would like to explore. A lot of people are crying censorship and are very upset about it. Some people are happy because as it has been alleged that some of the quotes and portrayals that were put on-screen are simply not true. Others are not happy because with the way the FCC is controlling the markets, people feel that CBS made the decision based on wanting to capitalize further in the media market monopolies. Ultimately this has gotten very ugly, and it really didn't need to.

The people who have it most correct so far are the people complaining about the FCC market media monopolies. As the FCC is continuing to shape ownership rules and laws for large conglomerates, CBS feels inclined to avoid controversy because they don't want to give the FCC any reason to hate them. This is all a part of the dangers of having too few controlling interests in charge of the various media outlets around the country. These are ulterior motives for creating and showing programming and it is obvious how easily it could get out of control. Who pays this price ultimately? We, the consumers eventually have such a sanitized filtered product on television and especially in television news that we can't possibly ever expect to know what's really going on by watching TV. Scary.

The censorship folks are half right. Due to pressure by Reaganites and other republican interests, Les Moonves made the decision to not show this movie on CBS. This is a form of censorship. In my eyes, if (and it is an IF that I can't substantiate) the mini-series is presenting itself as a biography and changing the truth, and/or portraying people inaccurately, people have the right to complain. If you want to smear a guy, make it parody, change the names and really let him have it. Don't smear him and present it as truth if it isn't. So, if this is the case, I don't blame people for complaining. History needs to be reported accurately if it is presented as being factual.

page 1 | 2
Craig Lyndall writes about all things related to Cleveland sports for WaitingForNextYear.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Future of Broadcasting
Published: November 05, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Documentary, Video: Drama, Video: News
Writer: Craig Lyndall
Craig Lyndall's BC Writer page
Craig Lyndall's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Craig Lyndall
Video: Documentary
Video: Drama
Video: News
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 5, 2003 @ 14:29PM — HH [URL]

Another point of contention is what Showtime is not cutting out, which is the repeated implication that Reagan had Alzheimer's as far back as 1985, which has zero proof to back it up.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/9852)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments