"Don't you understand, Rachel?": Gore Verbinski's The Ring

Written by Sean T. Collins
Published October 31, 2003
page 1 | 2

But the most disturbing facet of this intensely disturbing film is, as is often the case with great horror, one of cruelty. When you think about it, it's actually kind of obvious that all horror is about cruelty: "Look at what we're doing to your precious status quo. Look at what we're doing to everything you believe. We're destroying it. We're destroying you." But this is a different status quo than that of the small towns and suburbs that are so often the locus of horror. I'm not referring to the traditional business wherein the kids who smoke pot and fuck get chopped to pieces by the masked killer--no, not at all. This isn't rebellion that's being punished by the motiveless agent of horror--it's a whole new status quo that's being destroyed, one of leveling, of comfort, an "I'm OK, You're OK" world. Our hero, Rachel, is a foul-mouthed absentee parent who has her son Aidan call her by her first name. The kid's father, who Rachel insists must "grow up," talks to Aidan as though they're on the same level: "I just don't think I'd be a good father," he explains to the little boy the same way he'd explain it to Rachel, or to one of his buddies. Moreover, Rachel views the terrifying supernatural occurrences that befall her as a mystery she can solve, preferrably with comforting life-lessons about love and acceptance. She believes that heartless psychiatric workers and a domineering, abusive patriarch are to blame for it all, and that the murderous "sickness" that has infected her world can be soothed away through understanding. The filmmakers aid us in buying into this, slowly transforming the movie into a relatively traditional beat-the-clock mystery.

In the end, though, we understand nothing.

I won't go into it any more than that--I don't want to spoil this film, which should be viewed as unspoiled as possible--except to say that depictions of evil and malice as purposeless and uncompromising as this one are rare, perhaps mercifully so. Mockeries of goodness, of the soporific means of understanding the presence of badness in our world that we feed ourselves, are rarely this vicious, this unrelenting, this frightening. We're scared, alright. And we're more scared still, because we've been shown that the presence of that which scares us will never, ever end.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
"Don't you understand, Rachel?": Gore Verbinski's The Ring
Published: October 31, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Horror, Video: Suspense and Mystery
Writer: Sean T. Collins
Sean T. Collins's BC Writer page
Sean T. Collins's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Sean T. Collins
Video: Horror
Video: Suspense and Mystery
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 5, 2003 @ 18:47PM — jadester

it's a cliche, but having watched both recently, i can honestly say i think the original is superior to the re-make

#2 — November 19, 2004 @ 22:43PM — Nazza

Hi I think Gore Is an exellent director. If anyone knows this great director or even his email address . I would like to get in contact with him to talk about film. And I would like to get him to view some of my work and moderate it.
NO SPAM PLEASE.
Email me at mevetrix99@msn.com

#3 — September 23, 2005 @ 16:59PM — timmato

I used to be in boy scouts with Gore in La Jolla. He gave everyone wedgies. It's hard to believe he's a famous dirctor now. But great for him!!!!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/9729)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments