<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Office 2003</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:59:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bruce Kratofil</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24664</link>
<description>Michael --
In terms of Outlook and group calendering, that&#039;s what is so interesting about Mitch Kapor&#039;s  open source project, Chandler
http://www.osafoundation.org/Chandler_Compelling_Vision.htm

Usable versions of this are probably at least a year away, unfortunately.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24664@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:59:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael Croft</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24654</link>
<description>One of the things being touted by MS bloggers is vastly improved handling of intermittent connectivity.  That&#039;s nice, and points to a shift in priorities from adding features to removing annoyances.

I think it&#039;ll take until Longhorn and WinFS for them to fix the highly annoying &quot;search&quot; function.  That&#039;s 2006 for the architecture to be there, and unspecified additional time for the client to get fitted with the new gear.

Outlook is coasting on 2 things.  Truly superior integrated group calendaring and it&#039;s place as the default client for Exchange.  The former could be beaten (Lotus Notes used to beat it here), but the latter is a high hurdle.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24654@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:10:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24646</link>
<description>Does anyone know what this &#039;trusted email&#039; stuff means for those of us that don&#039;t use Outlook 2003?  

Will we all start receiving emails from Outlook 2003 users in some encrypted proprietry binary format that our existing mail programmes won&#039;t be able to read?

I&#039;ve been searching the web for info on this, and so far haven&#039;t been able to find any.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24646@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bruce Kratofil</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24645</link>
<description>Kevin -- that&#039;s why I had my disclaimer up front. But if you go to the other reviews I&#039;ve linked to, or Microsoft&#039;s own feature comparisons at 
http://www.microsoft.com/office/editions/prodinfo/compare.mspx
you&#039;ll see that there is not much for the average standalone user.

I cited Outlook -- but not FrontPage; what editions of Office 2003 include FrontPage? Are the improvements in those two worth the price?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24645@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:14:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24638</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;In short, not having used Office 2003 doesn&#039;t really qualify you to judge the usefulness of an upgrade does it?&lt;/i&gt;

since the word &#039;Microsoft&#039; is a part of the conversation, the odds are in Bruce&#039;s favor...whether he has played with the software or not.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24638@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:52:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin Aylward</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24631</link>
<description>In short, not having used Office 2003 doesn&#039;t really qualify you to judge the usefulness of an upgrade does it?

For users of Outlook and Front Page this is a significant upgrade in terms of features and functionality.  I&#039;ve been told that Access is much improved, but I don&#039;t use it too much so I&#039;ll not comment on that.  Word and Excel offer only minor improvements.

FrontPage gains handling for DTML, templates, abilities to work with Dreamweaver template (as I recall), full DIV support, cleaner HTML code, the ability to strip out FrontPage codes, split screen editing, etc...  If you are a current FrontPage user this is a version is a must have.

Outlook&#039;s new features include a new look, flagging options, HTML blocking, search folders, etc. and are available to all users.  In addition a add-on called contact management piece is available as well.  There are actually only a few new features for Exchange server users only.

I know all this because I was a beta tester.  And yes, I&#039;ve upgraded because I use Outlook and FrontPage extensively.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24631@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24624</link>
<description>Thanks Bruce, always practical and important information.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24624@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:16:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bruce Kratofil</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24616</link>
<description>Yeah, my import/export tests showed problems with highly formatted, heavily animated PowerPoint presentations.

But you probably shouldn&#039;t be making those anyway.

However, if you are making them from scratch, there may not be that many problems.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24616@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:36:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/22/111658.php#comment-24614</link>
<description>I actually played around with Open Office for a while and it is really great for Word and Excel files.  The only trouble I really had was that bastion of Microsoft proprietary mentality, PowerPoint.  Those don&#039;t import/export as well.  Certainly worth the FREE pricetag though.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24614@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:30:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>