Get yourself to a cinema and Kill Bill ... Vol. 1

Written by Tama
Published October 18, 2003
page 1 | 2

The first line of Vol. 1 is David Carradine's "I bet I could fry an egg on your face right now, if I wanted to." By the end of Kill Bill: Volume 1, that's exactly how you'll feel, but with any luck your head won't explode in the chasm of anticipation before Volume 2 graces the million multiplexes in February next year.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Get yourself to a cinema and Kill Bill ... Vol. 1
Published: October 18, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Urban, Video: Art House, Video: Action, Video: Westerns
Writer: Tama
Tama's BC Writer page
Tama's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Tama
Video: Urban
Video: Art House
Video: Action
Video: Westerns
All Video Articles
Tama's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 18, 2003 @ 18:54PM — Chris [URL]

Did we see the same film?

#2 — October 18, 2003 @ 19:42PM — Eric Olsen

Chris, in what way did your experience differ?

#3 — October 19, 2003 @ 12:23PM — Chris [URL]

I thought Kill Bill was entirely lacking of the twists and turns that made Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and True Romance so great.

"whose attack looks remarkably like the Agent Smith clones scene from Matrix: Reloaded"

Indeed, it did. And the ensuing battle with O-Ren Ishii was reminiscent of Crouching Tiger. To me, both of these were too long and too close to the originals to be tributes.

There were some interesting scenes, but overall I thought the movie relied too much on flash-bang fighting and not on the story. I had high expectations for this film. I'm a huge fan of Quentin's past work, including "The Man from Hollywood" in Four Rooms. My only hope is that Vol. 1 was all set-up, and the real film will come in Vol. 2.

#4 — October 19, 2003 @ 20:51PM — Tama [URL]

Chris said:
Indeed, it did. And the ensuing battle with O-Ren Ishii was reminiscent of Crouching Tiger. To me, both of these were too long and too close to the originals to be tributes.

But isn't the whole postmodern movie scene, Tarantino's playground? By that logic, there are *no* original films, *no* original scenes, just heightened and repackaged versions of what has already been (which all the Matrix films and Crouching Tiger are both guity of too). In that respect, I think the "obviousness" of the scenes actually adds to the film, although I would disagree that he does nothing newly-stylised with then: I thought they flowed really well and the juxtaposition of the Tokyo restuarant with all its contemporary generic references with the idyllic Japanese village setting in the snow worked perfectly as commentary/critque of competing (and, as Tarantino shows, complementary) genre traditions.

#5 — October 22, 2003 @ 23:24PM — Grant Watson [URL]

Indeed. I think people going to see Kill Bill with an expectation of a film as "clever" as Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction will be sorely disappointed. This is not because Kill Bill is not as good as those films (it is), but because this was not the sort of film that Tarantino was attempting to make. It is, like all of his work, a tribute film. And just like Dogs was a tribute to City On Fire (among others) and Pulp a tribute to Elmore Leonard (among others), so Kill Bill is a tribute to a whole genre of 1970s Hong Kong action flicks. It rocks.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/9294)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments