<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Lou Grant would kick the ever lovin' shite out of this guy and then enjoy a Scotch.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:25:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Arabia</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23520</link>
<description>Is Robert Duvall chopped liver?  Ed says nobody has tried to portray Stalin.  Duvall did so in a somewhat forgettable movie named, yes, &quot;Stalin.&quot;

The Inner Circle was not really about Stalin per se but did a nice job trying to portray the Soviet court.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23520@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:25:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Arabia</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23516</link>
<description>UPDATE: Asner is still sympathetic to the Soviets but the clown who reported the story misquoted him.  Correction follows (and reduces the humor value of this item to near zero).  Sorry, Ed, we&#039;ll always have Minneapolis. 

&lt;strong&gt;Asner should be spelled with one &#039;s&#039; especially in comparison to the idiot who interviewed him&lt;/strong&gt;

Ed Asner is still a bit of a Communist sympathizer, but he did not give Stalin the ringing endorsement that Professional Horse&#039;s Arse Kevin McCullogh attributed to the man who was Lou Grant.  Here&#039;s what Easy Ed said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCullough: &quot;If you could portray an historical biography and you had an unlimited budget, unlimited support cast and everything you could ask for, who would it be?&quot; 

Asner: &quot;Well, you know something, they&#039;ve played Hitler, nobody has ever really touched Stalin, it just occurred to me. It&#039;s not because I am a liberal or anything like that. Stalin is one big damn mystery, I wonder why nobody has tried it? Many people, you know, speak of the fact that he killed more people than Hitler &amp;ndash; why does nobody touch him? It&#039;s strange. So, and he was about my size, my height &amp;ndash; with a wig I probably could do it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So I guess it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;McCullogh&lt;/em&gt; who should get off the drugs.

Nevertheless, Asner went on the Hannity radio show and offered this sympathy for the Communist devil:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Asner said he believes that Communism has not really been tried because the United States, primarily, interfered with Communist countries&#039; functioning and integration into the world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

END OF UPDATE
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23516@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:21:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23264</link>
<description>An unreconstructed commie, is he? gives new meaning to the term &quot;limousine liberal.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23264@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:34:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Arabia</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23246</link>
<description>Big Ed confirmed that suggestions that he was &lt;a href=&quot;http://libertylover.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_libertylover_archive.html#105969008861952349&quot;&gt;kidding were laughable at best&lt;/a&gt;.

the idea that everyone everywhere will suddenly agree on everything, without which communism can only function through pervasive coercion, is too ridiculous.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23246@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:55:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23232</link>
<description>#5: LOL!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23232@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:54:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23212</link>
<description>
 The movie to look forward to is Bad Santa directed by Terry Zwigoff (Crumb, Ghost World) with Billy Bob Thornton as a Santa, Bernie Mac as an Elf, and John Ritter in his last film role.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23212@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 05:17:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23205</link>
<description>But come on, Ed Asner as &lt;i&gt;Santa&lt;/i&gt;?!  Even if the movie sucks, that&#039;s an inspired choice for a grumpy, senile Santa.  But no one - NO ONE - can measure up to the evil Santa in &lt;i&gt;A Christmas Story&lt;/i&gt;.

/ignores Asner&#039;s idiot comment.  I just had to get a piece of the Santa angle.  

As you were, people.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23205@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 01:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23176</link>
<description>great one, CC!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23176@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:51:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ClubhouseCancer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23174</link>
<description>That Stalin sure had spunk.


I hate spunk.

Sincerely,

James L. Brooks</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23174@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:48:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23172</link>
<description>This is another in a stupifyingly long list of statements by celebrities on topics other than their particular area of expertise that leaves me bewildered as to why anyone EVER listens to them.

Shut up and act, you loon.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23172@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:42:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23170</link>
<description>
 That is a really stupid statement to make.  All I can think of was that he was pulling the legs of a couple of right-wing talk show hosts.

 Unfortunately, his nephew Gavin Newsom may be the next mayor of San Francisco.

 Jules Ansner is engaged to Steven Soderbergh.

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23170@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:36:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by McBub</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23107</link>
<description>ed assner is a boob.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23107@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:58:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/13/120048.php#comment-23080</link>
<description>Ed&#039;s apparently lost his ever-lovin&#039; mind.

Oh, Mr. Gra-a-a-nt...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23080@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:03:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>