L.A. Times editor defends Gropenator stories

Written by Brian Flemming
Published October 11, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

The electronic revolution has brought us many blessings, but it has also blindsided us with a tidal wave of pornography. In similar fashion, we are now getting a faceful of rotten journalism — journalistic pornography, actually — in which ratings are everything and truth is nothing.


As the Schwarzenegger story came into focus, these were our choices:

* Publish it late in the campaign. Given the passions of the election, this would touch off an outcry against the newspaper. We had no illusion that it would be warmly received.

* Hold it and publish after the election. This would prompt anger among citizens who expect the newspaper to treat them like adults and give them all the information it has before they cast their votes.

* Never publish it. This could be justified only if the story were untrue or insignificant.

We, of course, chose the first option. Regrets? Not one.

When the story was published, Schwarzenegger admitted that he had "behaved badly" in the past and offered a general apology to any women he had offended. At another point, he said, "I have never grabbed anyone and pulled up their shirt and grabbed their breasts and stuff like that." But when asked whether he was denying all the stories about grabbing, he said, "No, not all." At still another point, he questioned the credibility of some of the women.

But the facts in the Times stories have not been seriously challenged.

The merit of an investigative story can be judged, to an extent, by what happens in its aftermath. In this case, the initial story reported that six women said they'd been sexually mistreated by Schwarzenegger. Two of the women were quoted by name. Four declined to be named, three fearing that they would be blackballed by the movie industry and one concerned that she would be publicly ridiculed.

Personally, I knew the stories were solid as Gibraltar, but I was worried that readers might see the evidence as thin.

In any case, it didn't take long for it to thicken. Soon after our first story, additional women began to come forward. Two appeared at press conferences to describe their ordeals with Schwarzenegger, and another did so at a political demonstration. Still more revealed their stories to The Times.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
L.A. Times editor defends Gropenator stories
Published: October 11, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Brian Flemming
Brian Flemming's BC Writer page
Brian Flemming's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Brian Flemming
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 11, 2003 @ 18:08PM — Ms. Tek [URL]

What I find funny is that the reports from women in the UK and Europe never made it over here to the US. When I was staying in Scotland, Arnie's escapades were made public during his promotion for the last terminator movie and before he was a serious candidate for Governor.

But it came from Europe and what do they know anyway?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/9089)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments