Prop.13 in a nutshell

Written by Hal Pawluk
Published October 10, 2003
page 1 | 2

Was this responsible for California's current fiscal crisis?

No.

Repeat: No.

"Between 1977 (the year before Prop. 13) and 1999 (the latest year for which complete data is available), inflation and population grew at a combined rate of 235 percent. State revenues grew 448 percent, California city revenues grew 333 percent and county revenues grew 326 percent. If Prop. 13 was supposed to slow government spending, it was a complete failure. Governments simply shifted to other taxes." [Senator Tom McClintock]

What Proposition 13 did achieve was to give home owners a chance against the "Spend-And-Tax" state government.

And that's a good thing.

So leave it alone.

Especially if you're from out-of-state.

[I'll be doing a more detailed Briefing Sheet with charts and all later on my site. If you'd like to know when it's ready, drop me a note from my site.]

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Prop.13 in a nutshell
Published: October 10, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Hal Pawluk
Hal Pawluk's BC Writer page
Hal Pawluk's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Hal Pawluk
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/9066)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments