In other words, schism can be a valuable protection for the Christian of conscience who cannot uphold his or her denomination's laws and does not agree with the institution's interpretation of Scripture. People of conscience can worship with those who share their beliefs and avoid those who, in their estimation, exclude and/or persecute those with whom they disagree. Methodists and Presbyterians are no strangers to schism; many in those faiths realize that sometimes the only option for everyone's best interests is to break apart. For some, this can lead to more honest worship, a more joyous relationship with fellow church members, and even spiritual salvation. Back in 2000, I reported that the Episcopalian and Anglican churches were showing fissures over the issue of homosexuality. It appears that schism now may be the only way for both sides of the worldwide Church of England's debate to walk away with even a small slice of satisfaction. No, breaking up centuries-old churches is not something anyone wants. But, in my opinion, it is better to split than to consign others into the hell of a second-class church citizenship supposedly mandated by God. In my belief, no deity worthy of worship would treat her or his GLBT children so cruelly. Sadly, though, some her her/his creations may do just that. It is better to run for safe, affirming shelter before the gale-force winds of intolerance and legalism hit than to be crushed by their punishing blows.