<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>Martin Scorsese Presents The Blues</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:55:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21815</link>
<description>MD, that is funny! Was he too sympathetic to the artistry of the descendents of the unpaid help?

I think the marketing difference just comes down to Burns himself. Over the course of doing his films he has learned to be a great marketer and merchandiser. I don&#039;t he&#039;s ever had anything like the volume of products The Blues series has, though.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21815@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:55:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21798</link>
<description>For the interest in the blues to spread to the hoi polloi there need to be tie-ins, Mark.  Ken Burns&#039; relationship with Starbucks&#039; Here Music and a special Borders Books pamphlet and CD series kept the material out there.  I suspect it may have penetrated to people who never gave jazz a second thought before.

A funny aside in regard to Burns is it was also the jazz films that got him kicked out of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21798@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:57:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21425</link>
<description>Disagree away! What would you do differently, how would the opportunity be better fulfilled?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21425@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:08:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jan herman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21422</link>
<description>Hate to disagree with you Eric, but I find the films in the blues series getting progressively worse. I think the best one was Scorsese&#039;s on the first night of the series. The rest seem dull, though I love the music. They&#039;re missed opportunities to me.
-- Jan Herman </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21422@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:45:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21281</link>
<description>T, you&#039;re right about the educational side of it. Scorsese and his minions have made a big deal about the series being &quot;impressionistic not pedantic,&quot; and that has certainly been true. The book and the CDs assotiated with the series are much more educational than the films themselves.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21281@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Taloran</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21278</link>
<description>I loved the Ken Burns Jazz series. I am also very much enjoying the Scorsese series. I am a much bigger blues fan than jazz fan (20 years ago the opposite was true) but I found the Burns series more educational (thus far.)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21278@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:39:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/10/01/134332.php#comment-21276</link>
<description>this is interesting. maybe i&#039;m not rememberin&#039; this correctly, but i could swear that the buildup to ken burns &quot;Jazz&quot;  was much larger than this....but there appears to be a much larger groundswell of blues support after only three nights of the show.

...which is fine by me (the burns thing was disappointing on several levels)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21276@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:31:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>