Music and what it means
Published September 23, 2003
BUT...the Emperor. Van Cliburn plays it wonderfully. His piano and the orchestra work together as few I've ever heard do, achieving a rare unity, a totality that defies description. The famed transition between the Adagio and the Allegro is so tight it fairly squeaks when it moves. And it does nothing but move. The Adagio itself is simply heartbreaking, in that beautiful, crying way that none but Mozart could really pull off. And of course Beethoven, just this once.
The Allegro is so joyous that it's all I can do to keep from jumping up, tears still wet on my face from the Adagio, and shaking the stiffest....fist.....you ever saw at the world, and defying any three of you punk-ass bitches to say a fucking word about it. It is just brilliant, that's all. If your heart doesn't practically leap out of your chest on hearing it, you need to check your heart, pal. Or have it done for you; most likely, you're all but dead and can't do it yourself.
Mozart plumbs the deepest depths and scales the highest peaks of human emotion, and does it all so effortlessly and routinely it's like watching the guy at Jiffy Lube change your oil. It's so easy for him it almost means nothing. But that, of course, means everything.
When Beethoven gets it, boy, does he get it. He nails it so completely you can feel those rusty iron pins going through your very feet, nailing you to the eternal bloody cross. And with Cliburn on the keys, well, the agony is just that much sweeter.
And to those of you who can't see the connection between all this and my usual rock and roll boogie-woogie persona, well, I pity you.
- Music and what it means
- Published: September 23, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Music
- Filed Under: Music: Classical
- Writer: Mike Hendrix
- Mike Hendrix's BC Writer page
- Mike Hendrix's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Very beautiful Mike, thanks! I am always touched and edified by your contributions.
Yes, yes: Rachmaninoff's piano music rawks!
What a fabulous post! Here's to those who consider music on its individual merits.
Love, a fan of both Mozart and Beethoven (and rockin' Rachmaninoff), who is running to put on the Emperor Concerto right now.





Mike,
AMEN. AMEN.
If you want a real rock and roll mother-effer of a thrill, pick up any recordings you can find of Rachmoninoff playing his own piano music. I thought I knew what the piano was all about, since I played it for fifteen years and heard bunches of van Cliburn, Glenn Gould, Vladimir Ashkenazy (who also does great Beethoven) etc. But Rachmoninoff just HITS IT. I knew NOTHING.
If you thought Van Cliburn playing Beethoven was like being nailed to the cross (and I totally agree), listening to Rachmoninoff play his own stuff is like ascending to heaven afterwards. Rough, sweet, vivid, and amazing.
Also, the coolest thing about classical music is that you get to compare & contrast performances. Hearing Van C and Rachmaninoff go in totally different, mind-blowing directions on the same piece (the Rachmaninoff Concerto no.2 on the disc linked above is a good example) is miles better (in some ways) than listening to fifteen different versions of Louie Louie.
And anyone who can't see what this has to do with rock and roll isn't even deserving of your pity.