Music and what it means

Written by Mike Hendrix
Published September 23, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

By the time Cliburn was scheduled to play his third and final round in the competition, all tickets were sold out. There wasn't even standing room. Like all participants, he had to perform concertos by both Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff. He chose Tchaikovsky's No. 1 in B-flat Minor, and Rachmaninoff's No. 3 in D-Minor. The orchestra was conducted by Kiril Kondrashin of whom Cliburn sings only the highest praises: "He was one of the most fabulous conductors that Russia ever produced.

After Van finished playing, the Hall burst into applause! Everything backstage was in absolute confusion. "There was a rule that after you had taken your bow and left the stage, you could never return again." But the ovation continued for eight and a half minutes. "Suddenly, I saw Gilels coming towards me," Van recalls. "He took me by the hand and led me back on stage where he embraced me publicly. The year before, I had heard this brilliant pianist play at Carnegie Hall and had admired him immensely, so his extraordinary public gesture overwhelmed me. He saw the jurists giving him a standing ovation and also was able to distinguish Khruschev's daughter and Queen Elisabeth of Belgium up in the Officials' Boxes. "It was such a thrilling moment." But the competition wasn't over. Several finalists had still not performed.

It became clear to Gilels that the only thing he could do about this Cliburn phenomenon was to approach Khruschev directly about the Prize and let him make the decision. So together with the Minister of Culture, Ekaterina Furtsava, they sought Khruschev's opinion. "Well, what are the professionals saying?" Khruschev wanted to know. "Is Cliburn the best?" They avowed that he was."Then, in that case," concluded the Communist Party Chief, "give him the Prize!"
23 years old. Twenty fucking three. At twenty three, I was still asking my mom what was for dinner, and not eating if she didn't feel like cooking that night. My God. At twenty three, I still had schoolbooks and "sweethearts." But then again, I lived a fairly sheltered life. Up to a point, and then suddenly all hell broke loose. Right around twenty three, if I remember right.

Van Cliburn went on to tour relentlessly, pretty much nonstop until 1978, and to be forgotten, as all real musicians are, sooner rather than later. He worked tirelessly to promote classical music, to establish educational foundations and competitions for young students, to just generally elevate us all. He seems to get more derision than respect these days, and I will never understand that. Nor do I want to, frankly. Not in an age where "music" means "ripped off guitar and drum tracks with monotonous dirty limericks recited over 'em." Not in an age where...well, that's a whole other rant, and maybe I'll get to it someday.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Music and what it means
Published: September 23, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Classical
Writer: Mike Hendrix
Mike Hendrix's BC Writer page
Mike Hendrix's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mike Hendrix
Music: Classical
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 23, 2003 @ 09:19AM — Johno [URL]

Mike,
AMEN. AMEN.

If you want a real rock and roll mother-effer of a thrill, pick up any recordings you can find of Rachmoninoff playing his own piano music. I thought I knew what the piano was all about, since I played it for fifteen years and heard bunches of van Cliburn, Glenn Gould, Vladimir Ashkenazy (who also does great Beethoven) etc. But Rachmoninoff just HITS IT. I knew NOTHING.

If you thought Van Cliburn playing Beethoven was like being nailed to the cross (and I totally agree), listening to Rachmoninoff play his own stuff is like ascending to heaven afterwards. Rough, sweet, vivid, and amazing.

Also, the coolest thing about classical music is that you get to compare & contrast performances. Hearing Van C and Rachmaninoff go in totally different, mind-blowing directions on the same piece (the Rachmaninoff Concerto no.2 on the disc linked above is a good example) is miles better (in some ways) than listening to fifteen different versions of Louie Louie.

And anyone who can't see what this has to do with rock and roll isn't even deserving of your pity.

#2 — September 24, 2003 @ 10:14AM — Eric Olsen

Very beautiful Mike, thanks! I am always touched and edified by your contributions.

#3 — September 24, 2003 @ 10:45AM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Yes, yes: Rachmaninoff's piano music rawks!

What a fabulous post! Here's to those who consider music on its individual merits.

Love, a fan of both Mozart and Beethoven (and rockin' Rachmaninoff), who is running to put on the Emperor Concerto right now.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/8592)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments