<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Emmy blow-by-blow</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 5 Sep 2004 05:32:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Emily</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-83508</link>
<description>Was just wondering if anybody there new
where a girl (me) in Australia could find any Jiminy Glick movies/DVDs/videos, if there are any in existence! Have only seen him a few times on pay TV, and wondering if Martin Short has realised how much $$ he could make from releasing Jiminy over here! Thankyou for your time,Emily.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">83508@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Sep 2004 05:32:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19693</link>
<description>You know what I mean smartass. It&#039;s like I couldn&#039;t care less, and besides Jon Stewart is the anti-Emmy host, he&#039;s funny and he tells the teevee industry why they are full of shit. So, from their point of view, they couldn&#039;t do worse.

(Wow, what a rationalization for sloppy writing).

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19693@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19675</link>
<description>&quot;they couldn&#039;t do worse than Stewart,&quot; meaning he sucks the most infected digit of all? Or &quot;they could do worse,&quot; meaning he is not awful?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19675@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Moore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19671</link>
<description>Huh, Stewart is my second choice for host next year.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19671@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:17:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19670</link>
<description>For some dumb reason, I watched the Emmys for the first time ever.

What was really specail? The fact that as the awards got more important, the shorter the time got. High-larious. Since I hadn&#039;t watched most of the shows nominated (except for The Sopranos and Six Feet Under) and hated the West Wing last year (though Allison Janney is still my teevee girlfriend, or is that Allyson Hannigan?) and most of the series I see are from online, the winner is bittorrent.

It got to be like the credit scroll on the end of teevee shows. And if they are looking for a host, they couldn&#039;t do worse than Jon Stewart.

Bill Cosby was just wierd and nasty (what&#039;s with the shades?).
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19670@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:14:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by frost@work</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19652</link>
<description>oh, that &quot;American Accountant Idol&quot; (or whatever they called it) skit was mind-numbingly dull.  I&#039;ve seen funnier skits... well, just about anywhere.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19652@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:34:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mars sanford</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19644</link>
<description>Henry Winkler and John Ritter were close friends.  Those who actually knew this about John would have consoled Henry on their mutual loss.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19644@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:37:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Moore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19643</link>
<description>Oh, yea, and of all the reality shows the Amazing Race is by far the best. Glad it won.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19643@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:37:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Moore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19628</link>
<description>About Malcolm in the Middle... I was hoping that the woman that plays the mother would win. I don&#039;t watch the show much, but she&#039;s hilarious.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19628@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by frost@work</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19625</link>
<description>That&#039;s funny... I only watched about 5 mins of it, yet after reading your blow-by-blow report I&#039;m sure I didn&#039;t miss anything.

And yes, you NEED to watch 24 this year.  It&#039;s stellar.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19625@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:39:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19624</link>
<description>Rare for me to see a TV movie, but I actually saw &quot;Door to Door&quot; and it was pretty great. It was a bit of a hagiography, but Macy was willing to show the character&#039;s &quot;dark&quot; side to a certain extent: his stubbornness especially, which was important because his stubborness was also what made him successful. I loved the tragic but sweet Kathy Baker character.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19624@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:37:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19622</link>
<description>I really, really hoped this year we&#039;d see a little recognition for one of the funniest shows on TV, Malcom In The Middle.  No, again, and as expected, Malcom gets snubbed.  This show and Scrubs are about the only two comedies I really care about anymore.  I loved Raymond up until last season, and with rumors they&#039;re going to go all &quot;Mad About You&quot; and throw marital problems and a possible divorce into the show, I don&#039;t see much reason to love it too much this season either.  I don&#039;t even know why Frasier continues to be nominated.  That show has sucked chum for years now, and definitely doesn&#039;t deserve a nomination for anything unless they start giving out awards for Sucking Chum.  But I have to say that I was THRILLED to see The Amazing Race finally get some respect.  It&#039;s the one bright light in the dull world of reality back-stabbing and bug-eating boredom.  It&#039;s about time.  Now if only people would watch the thing.

As for Door To Door, it&#039;s a wonderful, heart-warming story, and William H. Macy put his all into his character.  A real surprise something this good was actually acknowledged.

And I agree - Conan as host next year, please!  Or Ellen DeGeneres, as she did a fine job on her segment.  But please, no more Gary Shandling.  I know his calling card is his unsure of himself nervousness, but he really appeard to be having a very hard time last night.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19622@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:26:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/22/123635.php#comment-19616</link>
<description>Thanks Matt! I was really hoping we would have a reivew of it - I forgot all about it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19616@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:56:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>