"It's not like I'm selling it"

Written by Eric Olsen
Published September 19, 2003

The NY Times reports the RIAA is losing the morality battle among the Youth of Today, or at least this segment thereof. Remember, over time perception IS reality:

    IT shouldn't be illegal," said 14-year-old Sonya Arndt. "It's not like I'm selling it."

    "Isn't it like recording movies?" asked Korbi Blanchard, 13. "They're making a big thing out of nothing."

    "It's wrong to be downloading hundreds of songs, but if you only want one or two, it's not that big a deal," said 13-year-old Kristina Lee.

    When the record industry's campaign against digital file-sharing yielded lawsuits on Sept. 8 against 261 people - at least one as young as 12 - it struck home with students at Foothill Middle School as news events seldom do.

    Almost all of the 1,100 students at the school, in this suburb 25 miles east of San Francisco, have Internet-connected computers at home. And their musical tastes, like those of teenagers before them, are strongly held - Linkin Park, 50 Cent, Good Charlotte - as are their views of right, wrong and fairness.

    So Valerie Kriger, a Foothill teacher, chose music downloading as her Friday current events topic.

    Later that day, two of Ms. Kriger's classes - her yearbook class, with seventh and eighth graders, and her social studies and English students, all eighth graders - spent their class time sharing their thoughts on the subject with a reporter. In all, nearly 50 students wanted to weigh in with their opinions.

    And those opinions came out in a flood. Virtually everyone wanted to express some indignation at the recording industry, mixed with no small amount of confusion over the legal issues....

Indignation, confusion, why do we have all these cool tools if we aren't supposed to use them? Yes, the RIAA got the nation's attention with their campaign of legal retrubution, but the attention is not breeding cowed compliance as they had wished.

MORE
Another NY Times story states it even more strongly:

    The sweeping legal campaign appears to be educating some file swappers who did not think they were breaking the law and scaring some of those who did. But the barrage of lawsuits has also highlighted a stark break between the legal status of file sharing in the United States and the apparent cultural consensus on its morality.

    ....The persistent lack of guilt over online copying suggests that the record industry's antipiracy campaign, billed as a last-ditch effort to reverse a protracted sales slump, is only the beginning of the difficult process of persuading large numbers of people to buy music again.

    ....The record industry argues that sharing songs online is just like stealing a CD from a record store. But to many Americans, file sharing seems more like taping a song off a radio. The truth, copyright experts say, may lie somewhere between.

    And instead of significantly damping enthusiasm for file sharing, the record industry's lawsuits appear to be spurring increasingly sharp debates about how the balance between the rights of copyright holders and those of copyright users should be redefined for a digital age.

    ....But the file-sharing trend, which includes many school-age people, has spread across nearly every demographic group, with 27 percent of Internet users between the ages of 30 and 49 involved, according to a survey released in July by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Even 12 percent of those over the age of 50 participate in file sharing, the survey found.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
"It's not like I'm selling it"
Published: September 19, 2003
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet, Music: News
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Sci/Tech: Internet
Music: News
All Sci/Tech Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 19, 2003 @ 10:44AM — bhw [URL]

IT shouldn't be illegal," said 14-year-old Sonya Arndt. "It's not like I'm selling it."

Or paying for it. That's the problem.

#2 — September 19, 2003 @ 11:24AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

The biggest issue in this particular article, as Eric points out, is that we have yet to develop a way to get the point across that just because we have programs that'll allow file-trading to happen doesn't mean that it's okay. Kids in particular have a hard time understanding a concept like this, because there is no physical harm being done anywhere to anyone.

Personally, I think that were file-sharing not around, much of the music these kids and, indeed, people in general, download wouldn't sell all that much anyway. I think it's solely because they can get it for free that they do so.

The days of buying singles were over long before file-sharing became popular, as evidenced by the death of the single as a format (in general) in the US. The industry claimed they weren't selling, but really, it's more likely they wanted to encourage album sales instead. This has in effect forced consumers into buying full CDs for that one song they want. In response, and with the internet, consumers found a new way to get those singles. Putting it this way adds a unique twist, doesn't it? Maybe the RIAA should think about pushing the companies to release *affordable* singles - $0.99 a disc for that one song, with or without a b-side.

I recently passed on Radiohead's latest single - why? Because I really didn't feel like paying $4.99 for three songs, not when I could buy a whole new album for a little over twice that (yes, you can, if you know the right places to look) or a full length used CD for just a couple bucks more. $5 for three songs - 10-12 minutes of music - is RIDICULOUS. Lower this price and people will likely respond. Just like with the price of full-lengths - lower the price and people DO respond.

The hassle and time involved with downloading and burning is worth a few bucks to most adults, at least. I find it annoying, and I'm a big downloader of live material (not official releases, mind you.) If I, someone who is very well-versed in the ins-n-outs of this activity, find it annoying, think of how annoying it is to people who *don't* do this regularly. Kids do this because they have time to do this, not to mention the "rebellious" nature of it. When they grow up, they'll probably buy more, or, like most of my friends, won't really care much about music at all once their time becomes consumed with other more important activities. But the RIAA can't face reality like this, because it means that they are the ones at fault for the problem in the first place. Why blame yourself if you can point the finger at others who really *are* breaking the law. The problem ALWAYS relates back to the law-breakers, right? It's *never* indicative of another problem . . .

The solutions will begin to appear when they stop pointing fingers. Plain and simple.

#3 — September 19, 2003 @ 12:33PM — mike
Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/8493)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments