<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Funkenstein's Influence</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:48:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/18/094349.php#comment-19245</link>
<description>What&#039;s really irritating is that the great early Funkadelic recordings are a prime example of how copyright is in the realm of devoid of the funk. That is, some corporation owns the Funkadelic masters and refuses to pay Clinton and company.

The early Funkadelic records really show what a great rock act they are (Maggot Brain is a prime example). The fact they are owned by evil fucks shows how copyright is corrupt.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19245@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:48:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>