<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on <i>Adaptation</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:41:21 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Moore on &lt;i&gt;Adaptation&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/11/170505.php#comment-26420</link>
<description>I didn&#039;t say it was bogus or a joke, I said it was completely different. Didn&#039;t mean to imply that I didn&#039;t like it.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F09%2F11%2F170505.php%23comment-26420&amp;itemDate=2003-11-01+23%3A41%3A21&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Matt+Moore+on+%3Ci%3EAdaptation%3C%2Fi%3E"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F09%2F11%2F170505.php%23comment-26420&amp;itemDate=2003-11-01+23%3A41%3A21&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Matt+Moore+on+%3Ci%3EAdaptation%3C%2Fi%3E" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">26420@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:41:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by paras bhargava on &lt;i&gt;Adaptation&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/11/170505.php#comment-26416</link>
<description>Everyone says that the third act is bogus and must be a joke.  Maybe the third act is saying that pseudo-intellectualism is overrated.  Perhaps Donald Kaufmann, is really not as shallow as we think.  Perhaps Charlie&#039;s self loathing really does get in his own way.

Sure, the car scene&#039;s and the murder are a bit much.  But isn&#039;t there a metamorphosis, between charlie and donald, perhaps donald is really in Charlie&#039;s head.

Don&#039;t dismiss the third act so easily here.  Is there really so much difference between shallow and deep. 

<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F09%2F11%2F170505.php%23comment-26416&amp;itemDate=2003-11-01+22%3A52%3A18&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+paras+bhargava+on+%3Ci%3EAdaptation%3C%2Fi%3E"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F09%2F11%2F170505.php%23comment-26416&amp;itemDate=2003-11-01+22%3A52%3A18&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+paras+bhargava+on+%3Ci%3EAdaptation%3C%2Fi%3E" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">26416@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2003 22:52:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>