Independent Music Activism — Part II: Negativland's U2

Written by Steve Sabo
Published September 11, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3

The breaking point of the interview follows:

Negativland's Mark Hosler ["M"]: I wanted to ask you something more about the Zoo TV tour. One thing that wasn't really clear to me- you have a satellite dish so that you can take stuff down live off of various TV transmissions around the world?

The Edge ["E"]: Yeah, essentially the system is, like we've got the big screens on the stage which are the final image that's created. Down by the mixing board we've got a vision mixer which mixes in, blends the images from live cameras, from optical disks, and from live satellite transmissions that are taken in from a dish outside the venue. So the combination of images can be any of those sources. We've also incorporated telecommunications. We've got a telephone onstage that Bono occasionally makes calls from the stage and occasionally calling the White House or ordering pizza or whatever...um, phone sex...

Negativland's Don Joyce ["D"]: So you can kind of sample whatever's out there on the airwaves...

E: Yeah, it's kind of like information central.

M: One thing I'm curious about- there's been more and more controversy over copyright issues and sampling, and I thought that one thing you're doing in the Zoo TV tour is that you were taking these TV broadcasts- copyrighted material that you are then re-broadcasting right there in the venue where people paid for a ticket- and I wondered what you thought about that.

D: And whether you had any problem, whether it ever came up that that was illegal.

E: No, I mean, I asked the question early on- is this going to be a problem?, and apparently it, I don't think there is a problem. I mean, in theory I don't have a problem with sampling. I suppose when a sample becomes just part of another work then it's no problem. If sampling is, you know, stealing an idea and replaying the same idea, changing it very slightly, that's different. We're using the visual and images in a completely different context. If it's a live broadcast, it's like a few seconds at the most. I don't think, in spirit, there's any...

D: So you would say that a fragmentary approach is the way to go.

E: Yeah. You know, like in music terms, we've sampled things, people sample us all the time, you know, I hear the odd U2 drum loop in a dance record or whatever. You know, I don't have any problem with that.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Independent Music Activism — Part II: Negativland's U2
Published: September 11, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Writer: Steve Sabo
Steve Sabo's BC Writer page
Steve Sabo's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Steve Sabo
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 12, 2003 @ 15:02PM — Phillip Winn [URL]

It seems the purpose of Negativland is to provoke people in power. I admire that, but of course to then whine about the results is unseemly. ;-)

#2 — September 19, 2003 @ 09:38AM — Sabo [URL]

To whine about getting sued is unseemly? Especially in the case where, as is described in the interview, the act being parodied (and whose label brought the lawsuit) engages in similar unauthorized sampling?

Sounds like we have a serious difference of opinion as to the music industry. So how did this hurt U2?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/8280)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments