71-Year-Old Pickles and 12-Year-Old Honor Students
Published September 09, 2003
We learned yesterday about the RIAA suing 71-year-old grandfather Durwood Pickle as part of its scorched earth campaign to deter file sharing. While Mr. Pickle is a sympathetic figure and didn't do any file sharing himself, at least he is an adult. Today's poster child against the campaign is LITERALLY a child:
- The music industry has turned its big legal guns on Internet music-swappers - including a 12-year-old Upper West Side girl who thought downloading songs was fun.
Brianna LaHara said she was frightened to learn she was among the hundreds of people sued yesterday by giant music companies in federal courts around the country.
"I got really scared. My stomach is all turning," Brianna said last night at the city Housing Authority apartment on West 84th Street where she lives with her mom and her 9-year-old brother.
"I thought it was OK to download music because my mom paid a service fee for it. Out of all people, why did they pick me?"
The Recording Industry Association of America - a music-industry lobbying group behind the lawsuits - couldn't answer that question.
"We are taking each individual on a case-by-case basis," said RIAA spokeswoman Amy Weiss.
....When reporters visited Brianna's home last night, she was helping her brother with his homework.
Her mom said Brianna's an honors student at St. Gregory the Great, a Catholic school on West 90th Street.
Brianna was among 261 people sued for copying thousands of songs via popular Internet file-sharing software - and thousands more suits could be on the way. [NY Post]
- 71-Year-Old Pickles and 12-Year-Old Honor Students
- Published: September 09, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Sci/Tech
- Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet, Music: News
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
it'll be interesting to see how this whole thing plays out...especially in the area of how the mainstream media covers it.
cnn is owned by aoltimewarner, etc.
what i keep seeing, in print, web and television is the use of boilerplate phrases and descriptions like 'illegal downloading', piratacy, etc....when in fact the illegality of some of this stuff is up in the air.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/8234)
This is ridiculous!! What degree of blindness are they working with? What mind would tell them that this is a good thing. There are 50 million Interent users in this country alone. Most of which download something and sometime for whatever reason.
They have filed potetions for 261, approximately .005% by any standard that is a horrible percentage. Yet they see this is a path to success. In the more ghettoized world that is known as 'hustling backwards'.