<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:39:12 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by ideaful on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-490787</link>
<description>You wrote: &quot;Contractions require commas.&quot;

I believe you meant to write that they require apostrophes.  No?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">490787@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:39:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18151</link>
<description>The thing about Buddy is when he is on, his playing just &lt;i&gt;stings&lt;/i&gt; like no one else.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18151@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:33:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18140</link>
<description>I&#039;m jealous, Mark.  The closest I&#039;ve ever been able to get to him was maybe 15 feet away, despite having a press pass.  I&#039;ve leaned on local blues dudes, such as Curtis Salgado and Steve Miller, to let me tag along when Buddy&#039;s in the area, but so far, no luck.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18140@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:48:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18128</link>
<description>i got to go to the Buddy Guy record release party for &quot;Damn Right I&#039;ve Got The Blues&quot;...it was in a basement function room of a &lt;b&gt;church&lt;/b&gt; in the middle of a peabody, ma. suburban neighborhood.

it was just so weird to park in the back of this church, to then enter a huge room full of cigarette smokin&#039;, on-the-way-to-being-drunk blues fans.

and buddy rocked. oh ya.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18128@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:37:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18108</link>
<description>Gotcha, Mars.  Thanks for pointing that out.

Eric, the Buddy Man is just IT!  And, when he performs with Johny Lang it is as close as one gets to nirvana in this life.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18108@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:04:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18107</link>
<description>Natalie, I completely deny having abused anyone anywhere on this thread.  Telling the truth about someone&#039;s ability level is not abusing her.  Nor is telling the truth about why some white people &#039;adopt&#039; blacks of low ability as sort of house pets abusive in any way.  

I will grant that I could IGNORE more of the stupid things people say and I may adopt that policy.  I know at least one other bright Blogcritic has decided to limit his responses because one spends a lot of time talking to people who will never, ever, grasp what one is saying.  I don&#039;t know why I haven&#039;t adopted that policy more often online.  When I go to the beauty salon or the grocery store, I talk to the hairdresser or the clerk about the weather or a tabloid&#039;s cover, not Critical Legal Studies or communications theory.  But, for some reason I tend to treat people online as if they are more capable of intelligent discussion than most of them are.  Perhaps it is time to stop doing that.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18107@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:59:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by marsden sanford on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18105</link>
<description>MD, the phrase is &quot;couldn&#039;t care less&quot;.

/pet peeve</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18105@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:49:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dew on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18101</link>
<description>The only level of &#039;relationship&#039; that should exist is an intimacy level. To feel that an &#039;equal&#039; level of association is &lt;i&gt;deserved&lt;/i&gt; denotes a mindframe of inferiority. To be equal should be expected and silently understood. 

just a random thought</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18101@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:40:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18097</link>
<description>The poll can only take ten options so we just took the top ten from the Rolling Stone list. But that&#039;s why we also wrote a post about it so people could complain about the options and put in their own. Buddy rules.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18097@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18085</link>
<description>MD, with all due respect, just because someone calls you out for the abusive comments you have been throwing around does not mean they do not view you as equal to anyone else. Also, just because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they have necessarily been brainwashed by anyone. One more thing: All the oppression in the world does not justify abusing other people. Golden rule and all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18085@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:58:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18083</link>
<description>Fair enough</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18083@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:56:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18082</link>
<description>BTW, I am boycotting the guitarist poll because Buddy Guy is not on the list, Eric.  How can there be a poll for the ten best guitarists that omits him?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18082@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:56:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18081</link>
<description>That would be funny, Eric.  But there are a few black people so brainwashed they would make the same blunders Phillip has.  

Note that I am not calling him names or abusing him as he has me.   May he live well and prosper . . . and leave me alone.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18081@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:52:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18077</link>
<description>Okay, I made that up</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18077@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:42:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18076</link>
<description>At this point I only think it fair to reveal that Phillip is black.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18076@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:42:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18075</link>
<description>Correction, No. 18.

I hope this IS the last I hear from Phillip Winn.  When white people can&#039;t tolerate equal relationships with people of color I think it is best they leave those of us not willing to accept unequal relationships with them alone.  As Bell&#039;s Rules 4 and 5 point out, there are always people of color willing to play the inferior role white people like that are comfortable with.  That is the kind of person Phillip should be seeking out.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18075@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:39:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18072</link>
<description>Are you utterly delusional, Phillip?   Referring to me as &#039;poison&#039; and now a troll leaves no doubt as to your intentions toward me.  Nor did I  not realize it was me you intended to insult in No. 19.  I just chose to turn the insult on its head.  That comment is one of the most inane remarks I&#039;ve encountered on the Web, denoting a person who has neither a sense of race interactions or of group psychology.  Furthermore, your ridiculous rationalization (if multiple people participate in an abusive act, the abuse is deserved)  justifies ALL racism and most abuses of other sorts -- something a smart person would have realized when he wrote it.

Frankly I could care less about not getting further comments from you.  You are obviously so threatened by someone like me you can barely breathe and type at the same time.  Stick with &#039;great&#039; bloggers of color who can&#039;t write a readable sentence.  They will never threaten your sense of white privilege as I do.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18072@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:27:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18067</link>
<description>Just thought to mention this as a possible helper for writers:

There are at least two grammar software programs out there that while not being perfect teachers by any stretch, are still kind of cool to throw one&#039;s text in and see what the machine churns back.

- RightWriter, which is an old DOS proggy and I&#039;m not sure what has become of it (google it?)

- Grammatik, which comes with Wordperfect (at least version 10, it does).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18067@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:17:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dew on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18064</link>
<description>welle ced theori</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18064@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:13:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18062</link>
<description>The point of this entire exercise is, or shuld be in my opinion, not to dissuade anyone from writing, but to encourage those who have something to say - as does everyone here as far as I am concerned - to make their expression as readable as possible.
As Phillip said somewhere along the way, the better you know the rules, the more cleverly you can break them, or something.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18062@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:11:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18060</link>
<description>for the record, i cannot spell, don&#039;t know grammar, have no clue about proper sentance structure, or anything like that. So most of the entries i just grind out suck 100%. A few entries, however, capture my *sparkle* or something and become my inner voice which then become the entries which I look back on and say, &quot;Yes, that was a good piece of writing, flaws and all.&quot; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18060@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18057</link>
<description>MD (#26) I&#039;m very confused by your comment, which seems to be in response to mine. It seems that you&#039;re implying that Dew skin is of a darker hue, a fact I know not one way or the other. I assure you that my comments to Dew were in no way related to her skin color, but were rather simple statements of my opinion on her writing skill. 

You then seem to be further twisting my words and attempting to turn them into some sort of racial slur against you. I assure you again that my words were chosen with no thought whatsoever to the color of your skin, only to the bitterness of your words.

You missed my point entirely in comment 18, which is not surprising. Hint: It wasn&#039;t aimed at Dew. You don&#039;t seem to be as smart as you think you are, or maybe the bitterness overpowers your intelligence. You won&#039;t have any more comments from me to worry about, however, as I should have learned some time ago not to feed the trolls.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18057@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:50:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18052</link>
<description>Must echo MD&#039;s comment re: Julia. Her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/jmhm&quot; target=&quot;newwindow&quot;&gt;Sisyphus Shrugged&lt;/a&gt; is a compelling, well-written blog that is on my daily must-read list. And she&#039;s a great person too.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18052@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:36:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18047</link>
<description>Julia should join us, then.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18047@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:52:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Writing:  Help for bad bloggers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/08/145849.php#comment-18046</link>
<description>As I mentioned to Natalie in an email, an important piece of advice I forgot is to suggest  the writer read his material aloud to himself, particularly if the sentence construction seems bumpy.  One can identify awkward sentences better orally most of the time.  Natalie&#039;s oratory style is a good example of how speech can be an effective guide to good writing. 

Julia is not giving her blog its due.  Yes, she does some personal blogging, including keeping readers aware of what her little girl is up to.  BUT, she also is one of the best writers of political commentary in the blogosphere.  She has a knack for blending the personal and the political few bloggers can hold a candle to.

Julia&#039;s point about stats is also accurate.  Currently, many of the third and fourth tier blogs&#039; stats are mainly the work of link exchanging among the mediocre.  Good writing has next to nothing to do with it.   

I am not ignoring you, Mark.  I need to become more familiar with your blog.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18046@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:37:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>