<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Rancid - Indestructible</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:17:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/142955.php#comment-17539</link>
<description>i&#039;d say it&#039;s about the same...maybe with a little less speed punk.

definitely a fun album. i&#039;ve been driving to work with it recently and i&#039;ve had to watch my speed a lot, always a good sign.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">17539@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:17:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ParticleMan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/142955.php#comment-17526</link>
<description>...And Out Come The Wolves was a fantastic album. But how does Indestructible compare? Wolves ran the gamut of Rancid style: full speed punk to skankin punk to poppy punk, and all kinds of variations in between. Were they able to capitalize on their past successes?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">17526@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:00:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>