<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on It's ABOUT Time</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:52:29 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Robert Hollowood</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/115449.php#comment-26328</link>
<description>Problem: Wholesale costs are down for UMG tiles, but the new Sting album, which was the first title in the program, is marked at 18.99 in many stores I&#039;ve been in. The stores aren&#039;t jump-starting sales on titles that come from UMG. In fact, I believe they&#039;re using the savings they&#039;re seeing from UMG to offer the new titles, regardless of label, each week at 9.99. Bad policy for the stores. Short-term gain. Long term, I see UMG eliminating the policy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">26328@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:52:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/115449.php#comment-17263</link>
<description>i think that tom is right. this whole thing may be a moot point for kids.

on the other hand, people in the older ages groups may well end up buying more cds. 

i bet i will.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">17263@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:15:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/115449.php#comment-17256</link>
<description>What I&#039;m curious to see is if this will actually counteract the damage that&#039;s already been done.  The youth of today have practically been brought up to download and don&#039;t really seem to have any qualms about never having artwork, credits, liner notes, etc.  This seems totally foreign to me, as I generally immerse myself in a new release when I get it, reading throught liner and poring over the artwork.  Kids don&#039;t really seem to care, and don&#039;t even care about &quot;albums&quot; as a form of music delivery at all.  It will be interesting to see if kids respond - $10 is a lot more than &quot;free&quot; when you don&#039;t care about anything you&#039;re being asked to pay for.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">17256@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:29:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Johno</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/115449.php#comment-17251</link>
<description>As I noted over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://perfidy.org&quot;&gt;my crappy weblog&lt;/a&gt;, they should have done this YEARS ago. Ask any sales rep actually out selling CDs to stores, and they will tell you that $10 is the magic number. You can sell ANYTHING for ten bucks. I&#039;m a sucker for the bargain bin-- if I get worked up, I&#039;ll pay $9.99 for an album with ONE good song! And I ain&#039;t alone.

For new releases, the magic number is in fact about $13 as stated in the article-- UMG has gotten it right by putting it at $12. If only they had the brains to go down to $11.99, they&#039;d be working magic.

Now, the question really is, after they pay the exorbitant price &amp; positioning costs and ad rates, will they still make money at $12? 

If all the labels do this, this could be the start of big, big changes in how retailers and labels do business, and not a moment too soon.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">17251@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:13:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>