<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on &#039;Winged Migration&#039; (2003)</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:28:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by chris lincoln on &#039;Winged Migration&#039; (2003)</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/09/04/102219.php#comment-625184</link>
<description>Is it possible some documentaries are more of a visual homage to their subject matter, than a dissemination of information?  That the visuals are so enthralling and poetic, that it might be superflous to blabber throughout the picture.  Isn&#039;t the sound of the birds just extraordinary, almost like a meditation on nature?
I</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">625184@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>