<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on 2003 VMA Wrapup</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:23:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Schara</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-21592</link>
<description>hey... i dont care w/e anyone says.... this has nothing to do with this but linkin park is the best band along with Metallica.  Chester is the best screamer right next to Johnathan Davis!
I dont care what you all say.

My band is called X and we are an up and coming band.


Thanks for reading.  bye</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21592@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by M Baines</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-19599</link>
<description>From the New York City area, Learn how to market your artist and music on the internet at an event sponsored by the Grammy Ass.
for more info visit 
www.grammy.com/newyork
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">19599@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:26:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16564</link>
<description>&quot;is this how you want to be known?&quot;

Um, yes. Certainly &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; for kissing boys. Ewwww. ;)

I have been stupefied by all the newscasts calling the event &quot;shocking.&quot; Shocking? Please. Grow up, people, it was kissing. BFD. 

To these eyes, the Brit-Madge kiss was &lt;I&gt;hot&lt;/i&gt;. The Xtina-Esther liplock was decidedly less hot. In toto, though, it was just kissing; good for the girls. Hope they enjoyed it. And boo to MTV if exploiting the beauty and dignity of women loving women for the benefit of randy men (geez, Bricklayer!) was its aim. (Repeat after me: &lt;i&gt;Real&lt;/i&gt; women don&#039;t kiss women for the purpose of arousing &lt;I&gt;men&lt;/i&gt;.)

Why was Missy there? To sell a few million pairs of Gap jeans to those gullible folks who remember the Madonna-Missy ad. Oh, and because her &quot;Work It&quot; was up for, I think, eight Moon Men, including Video of the Year. She belonged there. And she was good, IMO; I love Missy&#039;s flow, and I love &quot;Work It.&quot;

No, the great Johnny Cash does not need MTV (that would be Tony Bennett) -- MTV needs HIM. Shame he fell ill. (Get better, Johnny!!!) I am glad his NIN cover won him a statuette (yes, he &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; have beaten Missy) and good on Justin Timberlake for giving the Man in Black the respect he deserves.

As for JT, he is THE music/pop-culture go-to guy and he is dating Cameron Diaz. MTV was giving him its slavish, ET/UsWeekly-inspired props. You expected something different? Whatever, Justin is cute. Why not a little guy-hottie eye candy? And JT is known for giving props to those who&#039;ve gone before: Michael Jackson, the Stones, Johnny Cash. It&#039;s Duran Duran&#039;s turn. And don&#039;t forget that D-squared was a &lt;i&gt;huge&lt;/i&gt; part of MTV history. Having him giving them big-ups at the VMAs makes perfect sense.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16564@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 22:50:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by aaron</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16561</link>
<description>I&#039;m not a big rap fan, but I think &quot;Work It&quot; is pretty damn good.  I for one am glad Cash didn&#039;t win.  It bugs me that the only reason he was on MTV in the first place is that he covered a NIN song.  I&#039;m sure most of the people in the audience there couldn&#039;t name one other Cash song, and really, does he need MTV&#039;s approval?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16561@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 22:17:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16437</link>
<description>I will admit that I am not completely down with hip-hop all the time, but there are definitely some songs I like.  Missy Elliott doesn&#039;t make any sense to me though.  She doesn&#039;t have any unbelievable backdrop beats or melodies in this song.  She doesn&#039;t enunciate or have an interesting delivery like Busta Rhymes or Eminem.  In fact, the electronic effect on some of the words that makes the chorus intentionally unintelligible is really obnoxious.  

But there is no right or wrong in the realm of opinion.  I just wanted you to know that I am not judging it just because it is a hip-hop song and I am traditionally a rock guy.  This song in particular just doesn&#039;t agree with me.

Peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16437@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:24:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16432</link>
<description>RE: what you wrote...

That Missy Elliott song was one of the few GOOD songs there. Incredible songs. Incredible. however, I still would have chosen Cash over Elliott.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16432@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BRICKLAYER</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16431</link>
<description>I actually felt it move when I heard them mention it on the radio this morning.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16431@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:43:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BRICKLAYER</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16430</link>
<description>Quit talking, you&#039;ll ruin it for me.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16430@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:41:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16429</link>
<description>Ok, did anyone read what I wrote?  Or were you all too blinded by the haze of testosterone?  

Yeah me too.  Testosterone.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16429@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:39:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BRICKLAYER</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16428</link>
<description>YUMMY. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16428@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:38:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16426</link>
<description>T.a.T.who?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16426@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:30:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16424</link>
<description>I saw a brief teaser cut on the news about Madonna locking lips with Britney. Got to give Madonna credit, I guess, for pulling a show stealer. Those didn&#039;t look like quick pecks with either Aguilera or Spears. I give those smooches an A! :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16424@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:18:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/29/092511.php#comment-16423</link>
<description>Thanks, Craig!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16423@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:18:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>