<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Dream Lives for 40 Years and Counting</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:33:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16484</link>
<description>When one finds the social convention abhorrent and immoral, one must work against it. That is something I learned from Dr. King.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16484@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:33:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16482</link>
<description>True.  Perhaps, the argument isn&#039;t what&#039;s petty, it&#039;s the way we talk around each other that is.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16482@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16481</link>
<description>Natalie, One of the things I most admire about you is your refusal to be categorized, either when it would be to your disadvantage or to your advantage, and surely this is what society should strive for. But in the meantime, there are some things that cannot even be discussed without referring to categories because that is the linguistic convention. You can fight it case by case, but it seems rather pointless to get upset about it in general - typically people mean nothing untoward by it at all, they are merely partaking of the social convention.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16481@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:11:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16474</link>
<description>I would disagree respectfully, Joe. Judging people by their character rather than by putting them into societal categorizations and such is very much at the heart of many of the &quot;squabbles&quot; taking place, for example, on Blogcritics right now. I see nothing petty about that argument.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16474@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:57:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16444</link>
<description>Thanks, Natalie, for reminding us of more important things than our own petty squabbles.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16444@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:32:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/28/171506.php#comment-16340</link>
<description>Beautiful and very beautifully presented Natalie, thanks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16340@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:46:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>