This Just In: Apple Not God

Written by Phillip Winn
Published August 27, 2003
page 1 | 2

And yes, crap is a highly subjective term when applied to music. To me, Justin Timberlake is like so many babies crying, but people who like that sort of thing love him. As it has become popular to say, I liked him better the first time, when he was Michael Jackson.

Would I like life better if musicians got a bigger cut of the money I spend on music? Sure. And yet despite years and years of people saying this over and over, most musicians continue to dream about signing up with a big label and earning a dime per CD sold, because they know that if they make it onto the label, they'll sell more than ten times what they ever would pressing the discs themselves.

There are options, even for artists who want to get into Apple's iTunes Music Store. CDBaby.com has signed up to be part of the iTMS, and they treat their artists very well, giving them 91% of every digital sale. The breakdown in that case is:

  • A quarter and a dime for Apple ($.35)

  • A nickel and a penny for CDBaby.com ($.06)

  • Two quarters, a nickel, and three pennies for the artist ($.58)

So Apple is doing what wrong, exactly?

Oh, that's right, they made the mistake of being successful and recognizable and therefore an easy target for a rant that has little to do with them at all.

But I guess Downhill Battle thinks that Apple ought to choose the path of ignominy that has defeated so many before, instead of creating an environment in which consumers (that's us) get great value while artists are free to pursue as good or bad a contract as they can get.

Hey, artists, try CDBaby.com. Or, if you want to be famous, sign with a big label. But then don't whine and say you didn't have a choice. You have a choice. You choose fame or you choose freedom, and fortune doesn't come easy either way.

page 1 | 2
Phillip Winn is the Technical Director for BC Magazine, which leaves him far too little time to write, which makes every article he writes that much more precious.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Justified Justified
Justin Timberlake
Music,
Off the Wall Off the Wall
Michael Jackson
Music,
Thriller - Special Edition Thriller - Special Edition
Michael Jackson
Music,

This Just In: Apple Not God
Published: August 27, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: News
Writer: Phillip Winn
Phillip Winn's BC Writer page
Phillip Winn's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Phillip Winn
Music: News
All Music Articles
Phillip Winn's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 28, 2003 @ 13:52PM — slim [URL]

the economics laid out with the idea of artists posting the songs on their own websites is misleading. sure, that way they might take in triple per song sold, but the band would now be responsible for all kinds of costs - they'd have to pay for their own recording, marketing, promotion, publicity, advedrtsing, etc. this could easily eat up the extra money, and if the band isn't good at it, could guarantee that in actuality the band will make a lot less money, and a lot fewer fans in the meantime. fewer fans mean less ticket sales and less merchandise sales, two other ways bands make money. most bands don't want the full responsibility for their own promotion, they'd rather concentrate on songwriting, recording, and performing, and furthermore most bands believe that a company who specializes in these things is liable to do a better job - they call this kind of specialty company that invests in sound recordings and then specializes in marketing and promoting these recordings a "record label." most artists have good reason to want a partnership with one of these.

#2 — August 28, 2003 @ 14:41PM — Michael Croft [URL]

The bands already pay for their own marketing, promotion, publicity, advertising, etc.

Some artists do make money at much smaller volumes then they would sell with a label, and there is no guarantee that a major label will ensure large scale success or profitability for the band. Music is the Gold Rush of the last half century and the labels are the general stores that are getting rich.

This is actually the discussion that let me to Eric's blog and eventually to blogcritics. The economic model of the labels isn't what it once was. The barriers to entry are way down (cost, expertise, etc), the distribution channel is being threatened by the Internet, and marketing is the only remaining stronghold of the traditional labels.

The value proposition to a band is way down, but the industry doesn't have a new model in place. I think it's reaching a change-or-die crisis, but I'm not sure when it'll happen.

#3 — September 8, 2003 @ 10:05AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

Michael (#2), yes, the artists pay, but they pay out of an advance, not out of pocket. There is a big difference, which is why the labels are still the Holy Grail for almost all artists, and why even the big artists unhappy with their labels (prince) eventually sign with another big label. Even with huge name recognition and a monstrous fan base, the labels still provide the "best" way for artists to make their money.

But as I pointed out in the article, they're not the only way to go.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7878)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments