National Lampoon's Animal House Double Secret Probation Edition - The Real Return of the King

Written by Eric Olsen
Published August 25, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3

(Many are now answering "yes" to all of those questions, but that's another mater) Animal House encourages excessive drinking, women as sex objects, rock 'n' roll as a way of life, and the party as a state of grace. It says that anything goes, as long as it goes with style. Style is the key element, because otherwise, what distinguishes you from the riffraff?

Getting shitfaced drunk and riding around campus naked on a motorcycle is cool because it shows style. Getting shitfaced and puking in the jacuzzi isn't cool, because it doesn't. Your fraternity brother's main reason for existence is to witness your exploits with style. You must have witnesses or what's the point? It's as important to regale your comrades with verifiable tales of stylish exploits as it is to have them. In fact the reason behind the deeds may, in fact, be to have something about which to tell stories.

Animal House is a litmus test of affinity for the rock 'n' roll sensibility. Either you have it:

"it finds some kind of precarious balance between insanity and accuracy, between cheerfully wretched excess and an ability to reproduce the most revealing nuances of human behavior." Roger Ebert's Movie Home Companion.

Mick Martin and Marsha Porter's Video Movie Guide - "If you're into rock 'n' roll, partying and general craziness, this picture is for you. We gave it a 95, because it has a good beat and you can dance to it." (Now that's a review.)

or you don't:

Leonard Maltin's TV Movies and Video Guide, "Spoof of early 1960s college life is only sporadically funny, depends largely on Belushi's mugging as frat-house animal",

Harold Schechter's The New Gods, Psyche and Symbol Popular Art, "the film, is clearly a low-budget production and often amateurish ... the crudeness, the primitivity of the film - its choppy editing, cheap look and narrative incoherencies serve to convey the essence ... as does the puerility of the humor, which consists entirely of very broad slapstick and childish, vulgar jokes."

Halliwell's Film and Video Guide - "A ragbag of college gags, of interest only to those who have had the experience."

So Animal House's success as one of the most lucrative comedies of all time ($140 million in North American theaters) shouldn't have come as such a surprise: the movie divided the world into those with the rock 'n' roll sensibility and those without it. And it still does.

Please see a discussion of the film soundtrack here.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
National Lampoon's Animal House Double Secret Probation Edition - The Real Return of the King
Published: August 25, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Comedy
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: Comedy
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 25, 2003 @ 16:26PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

nice article eric. i am so looking forward to getting my hands on a copy of this.

ever wonder how leonard maltin types those reviews in with that stick up his ass?

#2 — August 25, 2003 @ 16:46PM — Chris [URL]

"Hey look, it's Otis. Otis loves us."

#3 — August 25, 2003 @ 17:40PM — Eric Olsen

And indeed Otis does - I used to DJ frat parties with the actor who played Otis in the movie ( actually I DJ'd between his band's sets) and it was mutual love all the way around.

"So hit it ..."

#4 — August 26, 2003 @ 06:44AM — TDavid [URL]

A shame what happened to Belushi. Animal House is a classic comedy and well deserving of its success. Nice to see them push this thing for the 25th anniversary.

#5 — August 26, 2003 @ 07:54AM — Eric Olsen

Belushi, as was said of James Dean, was too fast to live, too young to die (bye bye). It was a total waste - he was unique. I am very interested to see what kind of public response the re-release gets - will a new generation care?

#6 — August 26, 2003 @ 09:51AM — TDavid [URL]

Whatever they do, I sure hope they don't attempt to remake Animal House.

It seems like almost every remake of classic original movies has been a disaster. Miracle on 34th street sucked, Chris Rock trying to remake Heaven Can Wait with that horrible Down To Earth and I'm sure, if desired, others can keep the list going.

Then there are the rumoured remakes like The Warriors and how about Westworld (going to be very difficult to top Crichton's sci-fi masterpiece with Yul Bryner saying, "draw") and most recently John discusses Superman here elsewhere.

Remakes and in some cases sequels too, pardon the pun, are the ultimate ghost whores.

#7 — August 26, 2003 @ 10:14AM — Eric Olsen

Yeah, ghost sluts are better because they're free.

#8 — August 25, 2005 @ 07:38AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

I can't even begin to imagine what a 2005/2006 remake of Animal House would be like. Yuck!

#9 — August 25, 2005 @ 08:01AM — Eric Olsen

some things are better left unimagined

#10 — August 25, 2005 @ 16:34PM — Eric Berlin [URL]

I'm ready for Blogcritics House!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7816)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments