Some people are just too twisted to live with other people in a civilized manner - how they go is of little concern as long as they go.

Yahweh have mercy Dawn, but you are one vicious little Hebrew hillbilly. I'm going to have to invent some special custom made stereotypes just to describe you.

Somehow I don't think Geoghan would have made it to prison if he'd diddled a child of yours.

I pray nightly that I may never know what I might do, as it would be gruesome, painful and ultimately deadly.

Really, I am a nice person, just don't mess with my kids.

This defrocked priest should have been killed sooner than this.

Also irritating is knowing that the church is paying $$$ for what happened and where did all that money come from? Donations to God! I bet God is real glad to know that millions of dollars intended for the betterment of the church has actually resulted in paying for the horrible actions of one of its since defrocked priests.

For those who are on the fence and/or skeptical regarding religion, this only clouds the subject further.

Imbecilic acts have a way of bringing out the imbecile in everyone, I guess --both fellow prisoners and the people who read about them.

Was this the avenging angel you had in mind, Dawn? Geoghan's murder was a hate crime -- it now appears the suspect was a Nazi thug who was on Death Row in the first place for killing a gay bus driver who made the mistake of picking him up while hitchhiking.

None of it is good - certainly whoever would have done such a thing (unless it had been an actual victim) was not going to be a Boy Scout. I don't think anyone is celebrating the killing, and absolutely not the killer, just saying they don't feel all that bad about it either.

While I despise anyone who would do what he did to children and see the killing as something akin to karma and/or poetic justice, I am even more contemptuous of the church that hushed his and similar crimes up, paid people off, moved pedophiles around without informing anyone of their propensities, and in general obstructed justice and conspired to allow the lives of innocent believers to be ruined. This bureaucracy is as corrupt as any in the world, or at least was.

Everybody recognizes that the guy who killed Geoghan is an evil murderer. No one is saying he's a good guy. In this specific case, however, he killed somebody who badly needed killing. It won't get the guy into heaven, but it was still arguably a public benefit.

Rodney,

The specifics of his death are of no consequence to me whatsoever. I am for vigilante justice when it comes to heinous crimes.

He got what he deserved, I only wish it had been after some brutal prison love had been administered on him, which in his case might have been welcomed.

I hate pedophiles as much as I hate murderers. There is no crime worse than lording and abusing your strength and will over someone weaker than yourself, and to do so to the defenseless is to declare you are not of the human race and therefore the rules of civilized society do not apply to you.

As for the murderer, I hope he gets his too. Eye for an eye.

You're for vigilante justice and you hope vigilantes get theirs too. Great -- let's just hand out guns and just start shooting each other right and left.

Please note though that in your original post you wrote: "I guess the image of small children being taken advantage of physically, while they endure mental injury, and emotional battery, insults even the most violent criminal." Was that the case here? Or was it maybe just a case of a violent lowlife piece of shit who was "insulted" by someone who was gay?

It's unfortunate that the convicted felon ex-priest was killed by an equally reviled convicted felon. Should it have been say a life-long crack dealer, or a jewel thief would you feel better?

They are both complete scumbags. But one who preyed on children is now gone, and maybe the guy who did it will get the death penalty for it.

I just can't get too worked up over a bunch of lowlifes killing each other, no matter what their agenda is. They were in jail for a reason, life in prison is hard and can be sometimes deadly - sounds like a good reason to stay out.

Well said, Dawn:

I just can't get too worked up over a bunch of lowlifes killing each other, no matter what their agenda is. They were in jail for a reason, life in prison is hard and can be sometimes deadly - sounds like a good reason to stay out.

Well, count me completely out of sympathy with both of you. I don't like vigilantes, I don't like prison justice, I don't like the easy way out in general. I can no longer expend sympathy on people impatient with the slow grinding wheels of the court system, particularly when it leads to this line of thought-free I-want-my-vengeance-NOW-asshole line of thinking.

Rodney - anarchy evolves from a society where everybody takes the law into their own hands, so I wasn't -- before or now -- advocating widespread vigilantism through my comments. Quite a stretch, actually, for you to make from what I've posted anyway.

Why don't you read my first comments and you'll see that my irritation was really with the fact that people go and donate money to help out the church and look at what expenses the church has to pay out on: the priest who was molesting the donator's children!

The church that cries out that pornography is evil and how every man should covet his spouse and yet some of those devout religious folks are the worst when it comes to sex "sins" when stories like this come out.

Hypocrisy in the church 101.

With that said, prisoners having their own system of justice is quite different than an eye for an eye in every day society. Can't you see the difference?

What would you rather do? Bake this pedophile a cake and let him clog up the judicial system in bogus appeals and futile rehabilitation attempts? I can think of much better, more productive uses of my tax dollars, can't you?

Sure this point of view of prisoners like this pedophile (and his ilk that capped him) sounds extreme and cold-hearted, but in my book there is zero sympathy for a murderer (especially a self-confessed one) and worse than a murderer in my book is a pedophile.

Not all prisoners are scumbags and deserve what this pedophile got, of course, but again, that's the prison justice system at work -- and it is wrong to compare that to every day society. Capiche?

Rodney, I believe you are mistaking cause and effect here: no one advocated anyone taking vigilante action, just said they weren't too upset about the fact it happened in this case.

Quite the opposite, Eric.

Dawn: "I am for vigilante justice when it comes to heinous crimes."

TDavid: "Long live prison justice."

He's got you there, Eric. The missus is flat-out supporting at least some limited vigilantism.

I am sympathetic to that urge to just goddam kill a particularly evil bastard, but I fear the lack of limitations inherent in vigilantism once you get started.

On the other hand, this guy was particularly deserving. It's tough to work up any sympathy for him at all. He had it coming.

As the bard said, all's well that ends well.

Rodney - what, did it take you about all of 5 seconds to snip that quote from me? How about addressing the other detailed points I laid out?

This is not intended to be a flame, mind you, but I am (slightly) curious if you have a real in-depth point of view or are just trolling? If you are in the latter group I won't waste my time responding to you heretofore.

I agree that sympathy for Geoghan is a tough sell, but vigilantism brings no comfort; it goes against the idea of a government of laws and not men, and personally it brings to mind that famous picture of the two black guys who had been lynched. If there's any kind of a triumph in the Geoghan murder, and there isn't, then it's purely Pyrrhic -- that's the point I've found myself thinking more and more. The killer in this case was actually worse than Geoghan -- who at least did not kill anyone. (This is of course not to say he didn't seriously wound his victims emotionally and scar them for life, or that he didn't deserve his prison sentence, or that the Catholic Church which protected him is not seriously culpable for crimes against children -- all of which I believe.)

Sorry Rodney, but I disagree with you about who is worse. Molesting at least 150 children had affected 150 lives, plus their families and anyone who is connected with those victims.

Murder is horrible and I find the person who strangled Geoghan exactly on par.

Do not attempt to lessen the severity of child molestation. There are plenty of people who feel dead inside because of their experience at the hands of a molestor and the effects can be far reaching.

Vigilante behavior should never be taken outside of the prison walls for justice has not been properly served, but inside, if you make your bed, then you must lie in it.

Why should prisoners be given freedom from crime and brutality when their victims surely were not.

Your logic makes you sound like a crazed person who hasn't taken his meds AND you are starting to aggravate me.

Dawn -- Let's pull in your claws, kitty. Your last statement expresses my feelings precisely -- although I am glad you have at the very least come round to the point that vigilantism, if it exists at all, should exist only within prison walls. This is still, of course, completely wrong; prisoners absolutely have a right not to be killed. And what kind of man is it that tortures a 69-year-old man for seven minutes? That makes him worse in my mind. And it is not lessening the severity of child molestation to say that it is not worse than murder; I'm not persuaded molestation, rape or torture are worse than death.

"Why should prisoners be given freedom from crime and brutality when their victims surely were not?" Sounds like you're all up for them practicing crime and brutality as well. Sure, let them all kill each other -- that's the easy, Dawn Olsen way of thinking. Prisons should be full of riots, blood, tear gas, destruction. Do they get to kill guards as well? How about wardens? And then the National Guard comes in -- oh boy, what fun!

Rodney - you don't seem to understand what prison justice is all about. While I'm certainly no expert either, I think your logic is flawed here and here's why.

You are saying that this is vigilantism and that is not a completely accurate description. I've never been in prison, but from my limited understanding, prison justice is pretty simple to comprehend:

If you are a child molester you are a marked man; you are the lowest rung in prison and regular society. If you are a murderer you are not necessarily marked. If you are a warden, guard or civilian you are not marked. The guards and wards are the ones who make recommendations to parole boards and give privileges, what little of them there should be. Many of these prisoners, even some of the hardcore convicts, are also family men with children and perhaps they are in the hole because they killed someone in a fit of rage, accidentally or unintentionally or while clinically insane, but most of them wouldn't dream, even in their worst nightmare or insane act, of molesting a child. That is another level!

I'm not trying to minimize the act of murder because that is wrong when people outside the prison walls take the law into their own hands and sometimes it is wrong when taken inside. Just as a policeman can't pull his gun and shoot a speeding motorist in the head.

I can totally respect and understand that being sent to a maximum security prison is not like being sent to the Bahamas. Why should it be?

These inmates -- some of which are animals, not even human -- live by a second set of rules besides the rules that society has placed on them. They sit around all day and most of them have little more to think about but concrete, brief periods of sunlight, and how to make shanks out of their own toenails.

I can't believe anybody would even remotely stick up for a child molester in any context. He has rights? Is that what you are trying to say? I think his rights ceased, in a prison society, when he scarred a child for the rest of his/her life.

I don't care if today he's 69, 29 or 109, if he molested over a 100 children -- or even just 1 child -- he's just a plain bad seed and belongs on the lowest rung of society. He has lowered himself into the animal kingdom where some animals eat their own.

Is the convict who murdered him much better? Of course not! But in the scary world of prison ranking that guy will rise up the ladder of prison respect. He took care of a marked man. Our law and courts will deal with this murderer and he'll probably get what? The death penalty!

So please tell me if the death penalty and prison justice for child molestation as how I've just described are really any different?

As it stands, our laws and our whole society is based on action and consequence. The prison system is also, from my understanding, and unless there is a maximum security convict lurking around blogcritics to set me straight on this, it is going to be difficult to alter my perception of life behind maximum security prison bars being any different.

We can't compare any of this to a minimum security prison where people are there for tax evasion or drug possession, etc, so throw those thoughts out completely as those people aren't likely going to kill this child molester in that prison environment, they are on a limited stay and can see freedom in the distance. Most of the maximum security prisoners are lifers -- or deathers if they are on the row -- expecting nothing more except to live out what's left of their meager existence with their own set of rules and pennies a day income.

Therefore, I still don't think this is outright vigalantism, but a way of putting the fear both inside prison -- and to those on the outside also who would ever dream of sexually abusing a child -- that whether or not the judicial system does its job (which we could both debate for hundreds of posts is failing on a number of levels with these type of criminals), the prison system will brand the convict forever.

And no matter where the convict goes, how old he grows, what penance he practices, his hell is now on earth.

Rodney, I did in fact, pull in my claws, that was my measured response. You should have seen what I didn't post.

As for your argument: what TDavid said, who may from this point forward speak on my behalf on this matter, as he summed it up exactly. My logic is not faulty, but my means of expressing it may be.

TDavid -- You are in no position to lecture anyone about this so-called "prison justice" which you find so romantic and which appears to have come from watching too much Court TV. Neither am I, but then again, I'm not trying.

You state: "You are saying that this is vigilantism and that is not a completely accurate description." Actually, that's exactly what it is, as vigilantism is by definition taking the law into one's own hands.

"If you are a child molester you are a marked man; you are the lowest rung in prison and regular society."

No question. This is a virtual cliche.

"If you are a warden, guard or civilian you are not marked."

Depends. Ever visited a prison? One particular graffito stands out in my mind: "Outside of freedom, the objective is to kill the fucking guards." This is particularly so on Death Row, where you don't have anything to lose.

"Many of these prisoners, even some of the hardcore convicts, are also family men with children and perhaps they are in the hole because they killed someone in a fit of rage, accidentally or unintentionally or while clinically insane, but most of them wouldn't dream, even in their worst nightmare or insane act, of molesting a child. That is another level!"

Gee, I hate to disabuse your notions of prisoners as people of superior morality, but let me try. Ever heard of Pee Wee Gaskins? He was the most famous murderer in recent South Carolina history -- sent to Death Row with something like eight deaths on his bloody hands. He believed in your "prison justice," too, so long as there was a price for it. When a murderer named Rudolph Tyner was sent to prison, Pee Wee (already on Death Row) was hired by the family of one of Tyner's victims to knock him off, which he did -- by wiring an explosive into the guy's radio that took Tyner's fool head off. Pee Wee was tried again and convicted again, and was ultimately executed. But you know what? Pee Wee had a certain fondness for children as well. In his memoirs, published just before his death, he recounted in sickening detail the circumstances of his most mind-blowing orgasm: killing a pregnant mother and then raping her infant daughter as he strangles her.

Was Pee Wee on the lowest rung at Carolina Correctional Institute? No. He was feared because he was pure bloody evil.

"I'm not trying to minimize the act of murder because that is wrong when people outside the prison walls take the law into their own hands and sometimes it is wrong when taken inside."

"Sometimes." Interesting. Who decides when it is okay? You?

"I can't believe anybody would even remotely stick up for a child molester in any context. He has rights? Is that what you are trying to say?"

Trying to say? You mean I haven't said it? Of course they have rights -- just as all these prison "animals" of which you are so fond have rights.

"I think his rights ceased, in a prison society, when he scarred a child for the rest of his/her life."

Well I guess by that logic so do all people who commit murder -- in fact, there's even at least a more logical case for killing them, at least on the old eye for an eye basis.

"I don't care if today he's 69, 29 or 109, if he molested over a 100 children -- or even just 1 child -- he's just a plain bad seed and belongs on the lowest rung of society. He has lowered himself into the animal kingdom where some animals eat their own."

Again, all I'm hearing is just your vehemence. We're getting into this strange, rather subjective area of degrees of evil; you say molestation is worse than murder. Sorry, I don't see it -- all I hear is your insistence that it is so.

It is so. So there.

Hah. Hehehe... Go Dawn. I posted my response to this on your own blog, so you already know my feelings on the matter. TDavid - your clear and concise comments are great. You put forward exactly what I cannot express.

I am so on the record about my antipathy for the Roman Catholic Church and those involved in the child sex abuse scandal (meaning the abusers and the hypocritical so-called leaders who enabled them to terrorize boys, girls, and nuns). But in answer to the titular question: Anyone with a heart and even a soupcon of humanity cares. Any death is a diminishment. Frankly, as I see it, Geoghan got off easy. And I am horrified, though not in the least surprised, to see so much inhumane bloodlust displayed here.

I have a long night of prayers ahead.

Dawn, child molestation is worse than murder? Do you really feel that way?

Think about it. You're saying you'd rather have a child taken from you completely than survive "scarred".

I've seen interviews with a couple of Geoghan's victims; there's no denying they are suffering and have been suffering for years. But some of his other victims have gotten past the abuse and lived healthy, normal lives.

Murder victims don't get that chance.

If your children were molested, I don't think you'd just give up on the possibility that they could ever lead happy lives just because some lowlife victimized them. All kids have to put up with injuries and indignities growing up; from falling off bicycles, to being poked and prodded by doctors, to having to change clothes in gym class. Why grant some pervert the special distinction of being able to ruin their lives through no fault of their own? I think if it happened to your kids, you'd tell them they're not to blame and that they can still grow up and be happy just like everyone else. And wouldn't you rather have the opportunity to do that than not?

Hate child molesters if you must. But don't put them on some pedestal of evil when they are perfectly survivable. They just aren't that important.

Indeed, JR.

To Dawn and those who agree with her: I was molested as a child. Not by a priest, but by the "friendly" handyman who painted our house. I was four years old at the time. Never told my parents about it -- haven't to this day and don't suspect that I ever will, for their sake (it is to protect them that I am doing this incognito, not out of shame). I am talking about it here because, well, it's time, because it wasn't my fault, and because my experience is germane to this sick topic. At the time, I was well aware that what happened to me was horrifying and wrong and sick, and the experience has haunted me quite a lot over the course of my life. But I survived it. I was scarred, most assuredly, and I'll carry these scars until I die. But I survived it. And quite well, on the whole.

Your position is that I would have been better off if Mr. Witherspoon had killed me, that he, a flawed, obviously twisted human who did an unspeakably vile thing to an innocent child, was worse than a murderer. I don't think so. Without doubt, the experience was among the worst things to ever happen to me; it is causing me untold pain right now to recall that afternoon and to put fingers to keyboard to write these words. But it could have been a helluva lot worse; I know that. Just as I know that there is no worthwhile justification for what Druse did to Geoghan.

JR - you are twising this around to the victim's point of view which was clearly not what was being discussed above. With all due respect, did you possibly skim the comments above and post without reading through them thoroughly?

The discussion was on the defrocked priest and whether the priest should have suffered the prison form of the death penalty, not whether it was "better" (that word seems very out of place here) to die than be molested as the victim.

Your take is certainly a very valid and important point of view, but once introduced here it's a whole other discussion and dimension and makes the rest of what has been written above appear out of context, which is why I am curious if you read the rest carefully and thoroughly.

Killing a child is every bit as horrific as sexual abuse and those convicts in prison who have been convicted in a court of law of that I'm 99.9% certain are just as marked.

Again, JR (and anonymous too), a lot of these prisoners have families, children of their own and see society along the same lines as those of us on the outside do -- or at least that is my perception. It's a fact that one can be locked up for life in a maximum security prison without being a murderer or a child predator. Not every maximum security prisoner is a bottom feeder.

A child murder is the ultimate form of violation and abuse. I don't see how anybody could claim otherwise.

anonymous - having the courage to share and discuss your story is a good thing, and I hope that continue to stay strong and speak out against abuse and help those who might not be able to be as strong as you are able to be.

I would gently and very politely suggest that it's a leading question to pose to a parent to make a choice between the two evils presented. Any (decent, loving) parent, given the horrible choice (and who is ever given that choice?) is going to choose abuse over murder for their child.

Oh, and Rodney - the only court TV I've watched is Perry Mason, some of the OJ trial, the Clinton Impeachment hearings and most recently the mock Pete Rose Hall of Fame trial on ESPN so you are wrong. Again.

I am in need of help. I hope that I am in the right place.

My husband Roger was in prison for molesting a child he did not touch. I have all files in hand and can show where he was not doing anything to a child.

I can and would be more then happy to talk with anyone that can help me to prove that he was innocent and to help me to clear his name. You see my husband died from cancer and that could have been prevented if the prison would have taken better care of the inmates which they do not do.

I hope to hear from you soon.

I have been working on this for a very long time and cant do this with out help.

Thank you for your time.

Cheryl

Well, i see The Punisher found its fans after all. All that vigilante law-into-own-hands-regardless-of-moral,spiritual or social consequences must be the thing to do after all. I'm off to beat up some vagrant. I think maybe he once looked at someone in an indecent manner. the person is 33 now, but hey, they were a kid once, so this motherfucker has to die.
Or maybe i'll read that old "he without sin" speech again.

The real issue is so much bigger. It is the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church that condemns abortion, birth control, and homosexuality, and pay for sex with young kids. It has been going on for years and by many. If you looking for someone to point your finger at.....well he lives in Rome, wears a dress and a pointed hat. That is where the buck stops. I think that people who kill senior citizens are hideous and should be killed in prison. My partner thinks the same of gangs. Where do we draw a line in vigilante action?

Jack e. Jett

Child molesters anger me very much too. They give us who are true child lovers a bad name, in their not being able to control themselves. I for one think that the violent molesters, at least, should get a taste of what it's like from some big dude named Bubba.

Children are beautiful divine creatures, after all, and harming them is a crime worse than murder.

Kat

Hi ya,
well take it from a person that knows ha
my husband molested my son who was 8 years old at the time..we pressed charges on him and he received a 26 year prison term...well why he was in jail , he escaped came after me..he sent death treats to me..any way, he was found and put back into prison , well not long ago, someone came to see him, they brought a little boy age 8 in with them, while seeing my ex in prison, he decided to molest the little boy...two weeks later he was found dead in prison, he took his own life..hung himself with a T.shirt...so be it...
You see if he didnt take his own life, someone in the prison would have killed him, they dont like child molesters, or baby killers etc...sence he molested that little boy, law passed in prison that, there would be knowing seeing their own children on visits,until they were 18 years of age...especially if they were there on child molestation charges..so believe me inmates didnt like him, so if he had not of taken his life, they would have..justified...no, even I didntwant to see him dead..there was a time I did though, i hated him so after what he did to my child..but after 15 years, I finally learned how to forgive...wasnt easy, but I found away to do it..do I believe that they system in prison works, no..but dont the know before going to prison that, if they kill a child, or molest one, they are going to have death threats made on their life, its a given thing in prison, its what emates do, to those that hurt children...did my ex make a choice to hurt a child , yes, did he do it freely...yes,...he choose death, it was probably alot easier on him that way, then to live with himself, for the things he has done to children..inmates have low tollerence on people like that..and so do others not in prison..
its a give thing, and it happens all the time..prison, takes care of their own, if it happenened in prison,and it was out what he did to that child of 8 years old, you can bet,he feared for his life...prison justice, big time..

sorry one more thing if I may...
my ex I just told you about...well when he was young, he was molested by a priest...sad but true...some say a guard killed him, some say he took his own life, all I know is he got a death sentence in deed, whats easier, death , or life in prison, ..I have no answers,
not sure there are any...JAN

Male / 17 / Florida

I was doing a study on the Michael Jackson child molestation case when I came across this blog. I'll be happy to contribute my thoughts.

Let's think about the American justice system for a moment. I studied in high school (I recently graduated! :]) that it involves a fair trial with a jury of peers, and a fair punishment for the crime, if a conviction happens. Since the judiciary system is in this democracy, created by the people and for the people, the laws that are created are to be strictly enforced without bias.

As another source I was reading put it, jail is not FOR a convict's punishment; it IS the punishment. The punishment is solely to be that which is prescribed by the courts. What kind of system are we running if we condone changing this system on the fly for crimes we feel are particularly bad? Many people agree that child molestation is bad, but, as was described earlier, there are plenty of other people that feel that other crimes are just as worthy of death. Once we start allowing people to act in the name of justice for a moral cause, what kind of other acts will also happen with the same reasoning? I'm sure that the maniacs that blew up abortion clinics and killed all the visitors and doctors felt that those performing the abortions were worthy of death. Of course, it was an ESPECIALLY bad crime, so those performing the abortions deserved death, right? The bombers involved killed the unborn babies, anyway. There's irony for you.

And what about the falsely accused or those that get wrongly convicted? Wrongful convictions happen a lot -- especially in death penalty cases. If you want to go on a moral crusade in your own defined justice, go to one of the countries of the Middle East.

Once we allow people to go outside of the bounds of the law they agreed to create and abide by, anything can happen. As one person mentioned earlier, we would just as well be handing guns to people and allowing them to shoot at each other. This is not the way the American justice system is supposed to work. It is an insult to the democracy we, the people, established.

WE have a justice system, laws we all agree to work within, and when we step outside of it, we are punished. Applauding a crime, and murder is a crime, sets you in the shoes of the murderer.
How sad it is to see that many people have a murderous nature, and are living their hate through another.People sent to prison for hurting kids should have to stay there for their entire life. Live each day of misery, feel the loss of freedom. Punishment over years is what they deserve. Murder is never okay. Was that priest a threat to the deathrow inmate? Do you think he feared for his life from a sex offender?
You peole may not be molesting children, or murdering people, but your attitudes are right along side of theirs. You don't have to feel sad that a molester was killed, but you should be asking yourselves why it was allowed. How did a deathrow inmate get a hold of him? They are always kept separate from the regular population. The prison officials had to let it happen, the guards all played a part. This is the system of justice you are applauding. That man loke all the rest in prison should be punished by loss of freedom. For a prison system to set a man up to kill another man is wrong. If you allow it to happen to anyone, then it could happen to anyone. Your voices are heard, your thoughts and feelings are felt, by us all. Please ask yourselves why you feel that his murder was okay. What part of your humanity allows for murder? Also wishing that a molester gets raped, wow. Advocating rape and murder, is no place to come from and cry justice. You either believe in our justice system or don't. Those that don't can always leave. It is a free country.

I am Anti-Death penalty and extremely anti-murder but it gives me a guilty pleasure to read that a child molester priest got justice served to him.

That priest got his ass sent to Hell.

Does anyone know if it was a stabbing, Italian rope trick, chocking or what???

He was chocked, definitely!

(snicker)

i really dont agree. Yes he commited a horrible crime and he most definately does deserve to be in prison his entire life and live a miserable life but for him to die that is a very sad thing. No one deserves death. what if that was your dad or uncle or dear friend. yes he did a horrible disgusting wrong thing but that doesnt mean he should die for it. Who cares? I do

Don't forget JESUS cares

and do alot of those people

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roar_4_freedom

and

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sosen/

resource for child molestor and sex offenders and get the facts stright


http://www.geocities.com/eadvocate/issues/

If one has done the crime, no matter what it is needs to accept reponsibility for what he has done,and do his time. Being killed by another inmate is not their choice to make. They are not his creator. God forgives for whosoever comes to Him. None of us can be forgiven unless we are willing to forgive. Love is the answer, not murder.

If you condone murder in any form, do not hide behind morals. If you examine it from a Christian PoV, God is the giver of life, so to violate that is to violate God. Period. Murdering anyone is akin to attacking God.

If you condone murder, do not claim morality. If you examine this in light of morality with no religion, the basis of all morality must be life. This means that all morality can be reduced to do not kill. All morals are derivations. Therefore, when you accept (in apathy or with applause) murder, you reject all morality.

Do not hide behind morality. Murder is immoral in any situation.

Or, as they say in my part of the country, "he just needed killin'."

I've got three children, you'll get no tears from me over this. If that means I'm amoral or going to hell, fine.

I despise any low life sonofabitch that would harm a child. You can cry for him, my heart pumps piss for him.

anyone that is so sick to take advantage of a child should be shot in the head with a .357MAG

Harry from kansas

"If you condone murder in any form, do not hide behind morals. If you examine it from a Christian PoV, God is the giver of life, so to violate that is to violate God. Period. Murdering anyone is akin to attacking God.

If you condone murder, do not claim morality. If you examine this in light of morality with no religion, the basis of all morality must be life. This means that all morality can be reduced to do not kill. All morals are derivations. Therefore, when you accept (in apathy or with applause) murder, you reject all morality.

Do not hide behind morality. Murder is immoral in any situation."-Mason

How about this, then, Mason:

Taking all the pedos out to their very own island. Since they cannot be rehabilitated, they need to be kept away from society. This would save taxpayers the cost of housing and feeding them. They would have to find a way to maintain themselves on this island. No, we won't murder them. But just keep them THE HELL AWAY FROM ME AND MY CHILDREN!!! And yes there are people who have no qualms about paying back in extreme measure who violate the souls of their loved ones. To hell with morals. Morals is religious-based concept. "Religion is the opiate of the masses" per Karl Marx. In terms of legality, yes to murder is a bad choice. But inwardly, you will find most of the normal people applauding it.

Visit this channel to see how reporters stampede a suspect pedophile and then bring him under flashing lights (3 videos)

i hate child molesters burn in hell

I have to say this. NO sin is greater than another. As someone else said he WAS someone's child. What child molesters do is bad. However why is it worse than someone killing another in cold blood or selling drugs to adults & Children? What about those who physically abuse their families? Or how about those who lie, cheat and steal. None of them know how what they did affects other people or since they love them so much, kids. Child molesters are no worse than any other criminal and the criminals who think that are stupid, self righteous pigs. And so are the people who think they should be dead. You are but a stones throw away from being molesters. Many kids look older than what they are. How do you know you haven't done it already? People are such hypocrites. As long as it's them and not me. You know something people should never judge others saying they wouldn't have sex with a child. Why? Because they haven't met every child in the world. One may come along one day that you are attracted to and poof! Now you're a child molester. Like someone said you have no power, or hell or heaven to put anyone in and you're filthy with sin so who are you to judge?

Good I am glad he died!! I didn't really hear much about this, nor do I care! I hope they tortured his and sexually assulted him with a pipe. Bastard!!! I hate molesters and anyone who hurts a child, they ALL need to die!! Hell let me kill em' My child is a victim, he's only 5 so If I sound outraged, you can damn well bet I am!!!!!!!!

I would love to chop up some little kid, find you, and make you eat the giblets. There is no justice, only revenge. Criminals like to think of themselves
better than sex offenders; a pitiful attempt at being the hero. One day I would like release allt he sex offenders from prison and allow them to torture
all their old prison mates.